RFC 4736 on Reoptimization of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE) Loosely Routed Label Switched Path (LSP)

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Sat, 11 November 2006 02:08 UTC

Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:58:47 -0800
Message-Id: <200611110158.kAB1wlsP019693@nit.isi.edu>
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Subject: RFC 4736 on Reoptimization of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE) Loosely Routed Label Switched Path (LSP)
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 4736

        Title:      Reoptimization of Multiprotocol Label Switching 
                    (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE) Loosely Routed 
                    Label Switched Path (LSP) 
        Author:     JP. Vasseur, Ed.,
                    Y. Ikejiri, R. Zhang
        Status:     Informational
        Date:       November 2006
        Mailbox:    jpv@cisco.com, 
                    y.ikejiri@ntt.com, 
                    raymond_zhang@bt.infonet.com
        Pages:      14
        Characters: 28850
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path-reopt-02.txt

        URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4736.txt

This document defines a mechanism for the reoptimization of loosely
routed MPLS and GMPLS (Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching)
Traffic Engineering (TE) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) signaled with
Resource Reservation Protocol Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE).  This 
document proposes a mechanism that allows a TE LSP head-end Label 
Switching Router (LSR) to trigger a new path re-evaluation on every hop 
that has a next hop defined as a loose or abstract hop and a mid-point 
LSR to signal to the head-end LSR that a better path exists (compared to 
the current path) or that the TE LSP must be reoptimized (because of
maintenance required on the TE LSP path).  The proposed mechanism
applies to the cases of intra- and inter-domain (Interior Gateway
Protocol area (IGP area) or Autonomous System) packet and non-packet
TE LSPs following a loosely routed path.  This memo provides information 
for the Internet community.

This document is a product of the Common Control and Measurement Plane
Working Group of the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. 
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution
of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG.  Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.

Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body 

help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:

        To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG
        Subject: getting rfcs

        help: ways_to_get_rfcs

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.

Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.  Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.


Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza
USC/Information Sciences Institute

...

RFC 4736 on Reoptimization of Multiprotocol Label… rfc-editor