[CCAMP] OIF draft on lsp hierarchy and control plane adjacency
"Ong, Lyndon" <Lyong@Ciena.com> Fri, 19 March 2010 02:24 UTC
Return-Path: <Lyong@Ciena.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082303A6CC9 for <ccamp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.039
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_40=-0.185, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oM9m7wRSuP+C for <ccamp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ripley.ciena.com (ripley.ciena.com [63.118.34.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6ED23A6C95 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4325
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:24:59 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_811D_01CAC6E9.D9B9C2F0"
Message-ID: <0AFD1B67B949784DA087CDA9F0DD4AD901720FE1@mdmxm03.ciena.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: OIF draft on lsp hierarchy and control plane adjacency
thread-index: AcrHC1+lIWW/s10WR1m4MxFBPb+uPw==
Importance: normal
From: "Ong, Lyndon" <Lyong@Ciena.com>
Priority: normal
To: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] OIF draft on lsp hierarchy and control plane adjacency
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:24:50 -0000
Hi Folks, This is a quick email on the OIF-sponsored draft on lsp hierarchy and control plane adjacency configuration (draft-roch-ccamp-reqts-auto-adj-00.txt): This is submitted in the form of a problem statement, as suggested in the GMPLS change procedures of RFC 4929. It identifies some additional issues with establishment of control plane adjacencies in the use of LSP hierarchy with ASON networks that we believe may require protocol extensions. The issues basically are: - Identification of the client layer in LSP hierarchy, if flexible adaptation to multiple client layers is supported - Handling of separate control plane instances at different layers o Automatic configuration of control plane adjacency in the client layer, with separation between § the identification of the resource in the client layer, § the signaling controller in the client layer, and the SCN address to reach that controller § the routing controller in the client layer, and the SCN address to reach that controller We believe this is not currently supported in the LSP hierarchy work, but that protocol extensions to support this could be done using mechanisms defined on the LSP hierarchy-bis draft (draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-hierarchy-bis-08.txt). We would welcome comments on the draft and look forward to a determination by CCAMP as to whether this is in scope or not and whether protocol extensions are considered necessary. Evelyne Roch Lyndon Ong