Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-04.txt

Sirish Vadloori <Sirish.Vadloori@ecitele.com> Thu, 09 June 2011 04:00 UTC

Return-Path: <Sirish.Vadloori@ecitele.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C1D11E80D9 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d8mhQRKVaS8Z for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ilptbmg02.ecitele.com (ilptbmg02-out.ecitele.com [147.234.242.235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C9611E8078 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 93eaf2e8-b7ba4ae000000a73-09-4df045060ebd
Received: from ilptexch01.ecitele.com ( [172.31.244.40]) by ilptbmg02.ecitele.com (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id D5.99.02675.60540FD4; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 06:59:02 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com ([147.234.244.212]) by ilptexch01.ecitele.com ([172.31.244.40]) with mapi; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:00:41 +0300
From: Sirish Vadloori <Sirish.Vadloori@ecitele.com>
To: Dan Li <huawei.danli@huawei.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:00:37 +0300
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-04.txt
Thread-Index: AcwmDnE8KgpQYY6sQIagIUy/tPgVkwASqjaw
Message-ID: <197119787ABA824E86690D0DB3DFB58855D1069F30@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>
References: <20110607034251.26283.45934.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <014601cc24e1$58f255e0$7d4d460a@china.huawei.com> <003501cc2570$9c93d280$7d4d460a@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <003501cc2570$9c93d280$7d4d460a@china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA2WTa0gUURTHuTPjOm5OjFur1yVou72tzVfGRq1FDzJhMcr6UMQ27t52h3Zn l5k13IqyBwgVViwViaGBPbRCMJGkiNzem9mDwLCosKVSe5gUPajszk6Z0Xz6zzm/c/73Xs5h aUOnzsSKUhDLkuBFOj0T7h34aNEt7rdnne7OtMaqHzHWax/bqPlUwa6rbxMK6uq+Usuo1eVg riBJ/qAQxGYXVpw2tEwWNwrOEDKLLhvKRuaAV3BiH5aCNiQEAlhyoXy9+b9vLsFEyYwlp98l Sm4bWrqiyGK15s22ZKP8SeOzc+foiz2iYsYWnyB6zT6sKIIbm0lkXTPt2d52lA7sHVd2Y2dm OfievhsksZCfCStuHkrQdCq897RRp2oD3wrg97OFu4Ge6DCA3051xSEdnws7flyOQ6P5JfBC bxiomuEnwP2H6+LxUfwKeLuyDWhMMfz2sOM3nwPP9VwncZbl+CJYfyld618P4MHDx+P9k/h8 +KDySqKqATnQ5+gZStU0nwa7YjWUdlAe1l28S2vaCHte/EzQeCN8UtEINH46rL0woNP0NHji WF+c5/gUeOtIjNFq02HbqUfMfpBaNcyialh51bDyqmHltYBpAEbRGwiW+NxZOTOwUwxiL57h 9PuagDYWr8+Dx+1TI4BnAUrm5je+txsShI1KyBcB6SyFjFzlwn67YWSJ3xXyCIrHIZd6sRIB kKXRaK70PsE5lxDahGX/n5SVvPIB2jTC6ScDKAUduVlZ//ygNG6P843dwLvJnG3AOIDlP6Vj WBZB7ssi4pgiYzcuWy96g3/TFJukOicT5zcqwykBwaeIbi0fBRb2R3VTBBgYyS9hUxpHk4E3 8CrkKZWG+qj7sG1wcLAXpJE7j+L61FbJZFuGOvUSE4qYRPe+U03IPgylTOWguiv6qmVWxe2G ilVronjM/ZqyEZ3dJ4tWCq26pq0pDevlze8dU9ozrM/5zuU14cUnLHKuMZb4dE71xBDakTPe jq4vnJeX964+8skRu3irNRGbnumVli0L7vht7YNiuHFtjbF1bQa178PINcyOA8UzpxSOdbwc eFXa3D3Z+6F/UxliFI+QnUHLivALVa6ZM+oDAAA=
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-04.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 04:00:45 -0000

Hello,

I have read the draft. I have a suggestion, please let me know if that makes sense here.

There are 3 bits here which have got a significance.

0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |S|D|C|                   Must Be Zero (MBZ)                    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Could we dedicate a bit to specify the support of OTN specific ports (OTUk/ ODUk).
We are working on a product which is OTN based and we are on the high tide in implementing LMP for OTN.

Best Regards,
-Sirish

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Li [mailto:huawei.danli@huawei.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 5:41 AM
To: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-04.txt

Hello,

To clarify my previous mail: The authors believe that the document is ready for additional review from the WG in preparation for WG LC. Please review and comment.

Thanks,

Dan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Li" <huawei.danli@huawei.com>
To: <ccamp@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-04.txt


> Hi all,
> 
> We have updated this draft according to the comments we have received during last Prague meeting and the follow up discussions in the mailing list.
> 1) Added a new section (section 2--LMP Message Modifications) to address the multiple config object issue. And introduced the config object to ConfigAck and ConfigNack to allow explicit identification of non-supporting nodes;
> 2) Renamed BEHAVIOR_CONFIG to BehaviorConfig to be consistent with 4240 naming style;
> 3) Introduced separate format and procedures sub-sections in section 2 and 3;
> 4) Slightly changed the format of BehaviorConfig, "B" bit was dropped;
> 5) Revised backward compatibility section based on above changes;
> 6) Added Lou as a co-author.
> 
> We believe the draft (04 version) is in a good shape, all the comments have been addressed, and it's ready for WG LC.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Authors of lmp-behavior-negotiation draft
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> Cc: <ccamp@ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:42 AM
> Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-04.txt
> 
> 
>>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF.
>> 
>> Title           : Link Management Protocol Behavior Negotiation and Configuration Modifications
>> Author(s)       : Dan Li
>>                          Daniele Ceccarelli
>>                          Lou Berger
>> Filename        : draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-04.txt
>> Pages           : 11
>> Date            : 2011-06-06
>> 
>>   The Link Management Protocol (LMP) is used to coordinate the
>>   properties, use, and faults of data links in Generalized
>>   Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) networks. This document
>>   defines an extension to LMP to negotiate capabilities and indicate
>>   support for LMP extensions. The defined extension is compatible
>>   with non-supporting implementations.
>> 
>> 
>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-04.txt
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> 
>> This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-04.txt
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCAMP mailing list
>> CCAMP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>



This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof.