RE: TE metric and graceful restart

"Naidu, Venkata" <Venkata.Naidu@Marconi.com> Tue, 21 May 2002 22:02 UTC

Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 21 May 2002 15:10:47 -0700
Message-ID: <39469E08BD83D411A3D900204840EC557631AE@vie-msgusr-01.dc.fore.com>
From: "Naidu, Venkata" <Venkata.Naidu@Marconi.com>
To: 'Kireeti Kompella' <kireeti@juniper.net>, "'yakov@juniper.net'" <yakov@juniper.net>
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: TE metric and graceful restart
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 18:02:57 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"

Yakov, Kireeti:

-> >   1. First of all, your suggestion might not fit well
-> >      with draft draft-lefaucheur-te-metric-igp-01.txt.
-> >      That is, just changing TE metric might help you to
-> >      stop _some_ unwanted LSPs being setup in restart
-> >      period but not all. (example, LSPs that use IGP metric
-> >      in OSPF regular LSAs)
-> 
-> Turn that around: Yakov's proposal helps in all the cases that can
-> be helped.  Do you have a proposal to stop/discourage the setup of
-> LSPs that use the IGP metric?

  You might want to consider RFC3137 in GMPLS restart section.

  RFC3137 - OSPF Stub Router Advertisement section "1. Motivation" reads,
     ...
        o  Graceful introduction and removal of the router to/from the
         network.
     ...

--
Venkata.