Re: [CCAMP] draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ethernet-pbb-te
Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 03 March 2010 17:46 UTC
Return-Path: <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F8128C1CF for <ccamp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:46:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7DBJsDHwQJDj for <ccamp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:46:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3ECB28C1B8 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:46:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gwb10 with SMTP id 10so906371gwb.31 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:46:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=J+wpCp2iKNaUn4Jv3T/xNYQdlzWPv8icIJE/FI5DMiA=; b=au+fNZ5/oaNLgzT7+I9FymTcnWJE+GJQ2ZriuZkxGqTRnDgychbBCHVX+ciwEjHDKF mXHB43wvZVPmdPDuDXsC31UgXS87yvMQNciVQOmQ6PVOBPqfOGUkcbuHeSjWG0XW/lUi XtRU6ULu+2D60V/Uss9CTc+lPCTgi+e75uMu4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=IzIW9bMMTyFGkY9+zeLRWj1YiGCidMqex2+GVaeA2iRHWLw26D29lQG8JqU/4FV7r8 1Fm6pF0B+Vn39r48+D9Dmx5w5rqm5KvV9y5CfhCdU1M3570kgiMkgjh0IaR/sFzVrMCZ 63ITte3R9sF/He72Di1ZRuOsfwS/xD3XH7ez4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.2.32 with SMTP id e32mr731980ani.239.1267638373658; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:46:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <292BD6E016C29243BB231D329D626C8C036DE005@USDALSMBS05.ad3.ad.alcatel.com>
References: <77ead0ec1003030654x515df4a8r12803ad301a2bf23@mail.gmail.com> <292BD6E016C29243BB231D329D626C8C036DE005@USDALSMBS05.ad3.ad.alcatel.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:46:13 -0800
Message-ID: <77ead0ec1003030946n79f37e0dg8656338fe078dcc8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: FEDYK Don <Donald.Fedyk@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016368e2a69f730f30480e90ed2"
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org, nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ethernet-pbb-te
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:46:16 -0000
Hi Don, Interesting. The datalink itself may not have an IP address at all though. What we are planning to do is use a broadcast IP address as well as Broadcast MAC address for the destination address and push the packet over the link. The receiver is using only the physical data channel to determine the data channel over which the packet came (addreses are themselves not used). Maybe you can add some text regarding this in the draft? Do you know of other implementations of the draft so that we can think of some interops? Thanks, Vishwas On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:21 AM, FEDYK Don <Donald.Fedyk@alcatel-lucent.com>wrote: > Hi Vishwas > > Since this is Ethernet which can easily transport a message on the data > link all you need is the ability to handle a UDP (over Ethernet) message > addressed to the local IP loopback at the other end of the link. > > Note that these are point to point messages and an IP routing layer is not > required. > > Don > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Vishwas Manral [mailto:vishwas.ietf@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 03, 2010 9:54 AM > *To:* ccamp@ietf.org; FEDYK Don; David Allan I; hshah@force10networks.com; > nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com; attila.takacs@ericsson.com; > diego.caviglia@ericsson.com; alan.mcguire@bt.com; nurit.sprecher@nsn.com; > lberger@labn.net > *Subject:* draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ethernet-pbb-te > > Hi, > > It seems there is no reference to how an LMP test message can be sent over > the PBB-TE link. Doesn't it need to be specified? > > Thanks, > Vishwas > > >
- [CCAMP] draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ethernet-pbb-te Vishwas Manral
- Re: [CCAMP] draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ethernet-pbb-te FEDYK Don
- Re: [CCAMP] draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ethernet-pbb-te Vishwas Manral