[CCAMP] Do we need a definition for the term "T-NBI"..?

Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com> Fri, 22 March 2024 01:01 UTC

Return-Path: <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41ED9C14F6B6; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 18:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UuWY7OpzlzdO; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 18:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE5CAC14F6FA; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 18:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V13n01mjfz6K8xx; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 08:56:36 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml100007.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.133]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3103E140C98; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:00:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.172) by frapeml100007.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.133) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 02:00:55 +0100
Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) by frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.035; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 02:00:55 +0100
From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
To: "'ccamp@ietf.org'" <ccamp@ietf.org>
CC: "transport-nbi-dt@ietf.org" <transport-nbi-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Do we need a definition for the term "T-NBI"..?
Thread-Index: Adp79BHNRH5bqAugSreOHWqdP4ugCg==
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 01:00:55 +0000
Message-ID: <180bce4510e1440384c96acdf5d6c958@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.126.201.17]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_180bce4510e1440384c96acdf5d6c958huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/k7E0eS9vIup-B4Ai4tzFLgWRSfA>
Subject: [CCAMP] Do we need a definition for the term "T-NBI"..?
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 01:01:07 -0000

As discussed during the CCAMP WG session today, we are looking for some feedbacks from the WG about this open issue we are discussing in the context of the TNBI DT:

https://github.com/ietf-ccamp-wg/transport-nbi/issues/115

The initial definition (to be improved) we are considering is the following:

      The optical transport domain is designed to support various connectivity services, such as Wave Division Multiplexing (WDM) and the Optical Transport Network (OTN). A primary objective for network operators is to automate the establishment of these services in single-layer and complex hierarchical, multi-domain optical transport networks. Exposing capability and infrastructure assets are crucial to providing access to network resources and offering advanced control and manageability features. Optical transport Application Programming Interface (API) becomes essential to achieve this.
      The "Transport Northbound Interface" (T-NBI) API are well-defined, open interfaces vital for network operators. They provide the capability to view optical transport resources and effectively operate multi-vendor and multi-domain networks. Furthermore, the T-NBI API is instrumental in facilitating the coordination and automation of service provisioning, thereby enhancing efficiency and operational flexibility when managing optical network resources.
Do you have any comments or suggestions on how to improve this definition?

Thanks, Italo