IAB decision on how to prepare for a potential cooperation between IETF and ITU-T on t-mpls
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se> Thu, 18 October 2007 09:49 UTC
Return-path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IiS03-0005Ik-1b for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:49:07 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IiS02-00007K-Hd for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:49:06 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1IiRrz-0003rg-9Y for ccamp-data@psg.com; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:40:47 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO autolearn=no version=3.2.1
Received: from [80.86.78.228] (helo=fw.testbed.se) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <loa@pi.se>) id 1IiRrs-0003m2-HK for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:40:42 +0000
Received: from MailerDaemon by fw.testbed.se with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <loa@pi.se>) id 1IiRrp-00022l-Bc for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:40:37 +0200
Received: from gw.imc.kth.se ([193.10.152.67]:5972 helo=[172.16.2.35]) by fw.testbed.se with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <loa@pi.se>) id 1IiRrn-00022N-KI; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:40:35 +0200
Message-ID: <47172A0B.4030806@pi.se>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:40:27 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
Organization: Acreo AB
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Iesg (E-mail)" <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: mpls@ietf.org, pwe3 <pwe3@ietf.org>, ccamp <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Deborah Brungard <dbrungard@att.com>, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>, IAB <iab@iab.org>
Subject: IAB decision on how to prepare for a potential cooperation between IETF and ITU-T on t-mpls
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0204.471729F1.01C9,ss=1,fgs=0
X-cff-SpamScore: 0(/)
X-cff-SpamReport: ----- ----- Message is unknown to the spam scanner.
X-cff-LastScanner: footer
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 00e94c813bef7832af255170dca19e36
To the IESG cc mpls, pwe3 and ccamp working groups The ownership of what needs to be done to prepare for a situation where an agreement on cooperation between ITU-T and the IETF on T-MPLS would be reached does not currently have a clear home in the IETF, neither are concrete objectives or explicit requirements well-defined. The liaison activities that surround this agreement and proper focus on this work within the IETF are critical, and as such, the IAB needs to heavily support these activities. At the IAB meeting October 3 the IAB agreed that the IETF need a dedicated team that could evaluate "what would need to be done if the agreement that might come out of the Q12/15 meeting in Stuttgart is progressed". As a result the IAB decided on a design team approach, the design team charter will be to come up with a list of tasks need to be done as a result of the potential agreement and come up with a proposal on how it should be managed. We believe that some degree of education of people from the ITU-T side in the Tao of IETF should be planned. And a reciprocal function would likely be worthwhile as well. We see this tasked team as a forerunner to the joint team we are about to set up together with the ITU-T. Things I see that need to be clarified are: - which decisions taken by IETF working groups needs to be revisited; e.g., only LDP v. RSVP-TE for PWE3? - where are the incompatibilities between IETF specifications and the ITU-T documents - what type of requirement organization do we need, should we try to channel it through existing working groups or start a new - in what format could we accept requirements from ITU-T - etc (please add to the list) It is our take that this design team should include people that have been actively involved in sorting out the T-MPLS issues up to now, e.g.: - someone from the Internet Area - someone from the Routing Area - someone from the pwe3 wg - someone from the mpls wg - our mpls liaison to the ITU-T - someone from the IAB - someone from the IESG This does not automatically add up to 7 or more people, since we have certain possible overlap; we should also take care in not having a to strong representation from one single company. We want to appoint the design team as soon as possible, and we will approach people that matches the list above, and of course we like the recipients of this mail to suggest names. On behalf of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) Loa Andersson -- Loa Andersson Principal Networking Architect Acreo AB phone: +46 8 632 77 14 Isafjordsgatan 22 mobile: +46 739 81 21 64 Kista, Sweden email: loa.andersson@acreo.se loa@pi.se This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.astaro.com
- IAB decision on how to prepare for a potential co… Loa Andersson