Re: [CCAMP] Request for early IANA Allocation of values for new flag and RRO sub-object in draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

Adrian has it right.  The best way to craft a request for allocation is
to show the exact modification you'd like to see in the exiting IANA
registry (based on the text version).

Lou
On 8/25/2014 2:24 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure whether Lou missed this or just didn't work over the weekend :-)
>
> Anyway, yes, you need to supply a fully functional IANA Considerations section that tells IANA exactly what to do.
>
> The easiest way to do this is:
> - cut and paste the name of the registry
> - cut and paste the name of the sub-registry
> - cut and paste the table column headers
>    (use the ASCII version of the registry)
> - fill in the details
>
> A
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS [mailto:[e-mail]]
>> Sent: 20 August 2014 17:45
>> To: Lou Berger
>> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; 'CCAMP'
>> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Request for early IANA Allocation of values for new flag
>> and RRO sub-object in draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05
>>
>> Hi Lou,
>>
>>   I think we have a misunderstanding. You are referring in your mail to
>> the Attributes TLV space (where a new entry should add  "Allowed on
>> LSP_ATTRIBUTES", "Allowed on LSP_REQUIRED_ATTRIBUTES Reference”). We
>> are
>> referring to the Attribute Flags section of
>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-te-parameters/rsvp-te-
>> parameters.xhtm
>> l which compiles the flags of the Attribute Flags TLV.
>>
>> The fields there are:
>>
>> Bit No  Name    Attribute Flags Path    Attribute Flags Resv    RRO     Reference
>>
>>
>> RFC 5420 says (textually):
>>
>> "Each bit should be tracked with the following qualities:
>>
>>    - Bit number
>>    - Defining RFC
>>    - Name of bit
>>    - Whether there is meaning in the Attribute Flags TLV on a Path
>>    - Whether there is meaning in the Attribute Flags TLV on a Resv
>>    - Whether there is meaning in the RRO Attributes subobject
>> “
>>
>> I guess these are the columns we should include. Right?
>>
>> Óscar
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> El 01/08/14 13:16, "Lou Berger" <[e-mail]> escribió:
>>
>>> Oscar,
>>>    Thanks for the update.  I think you missed a couple of things that
>>> were in my request to Adrian:
>>>
>>> 1. For Attributes TLV Space, please provide all columns in the registry,
>>> i.e.,  "Type", "Name", "Allowed on LSP_ATTRIBUTES", "Allowed on
>>> LSP_REQUIRED_ATTRIBUTES Reference".
>>>
>>> 2. Add "value 34 is suggested to align with exclude route" (I mistakenly
>>> said ERO in my previous mail)
>>>
>>> Once these changes are submitted I can forward the early allocation
>>> request.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Lou
>>>
>>> On 8/1/2014 2:46 AM, OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS wrote:
>>>> Hi Adrian, Lou,
>>>>
>>>>   I have posted a new version of the draft
>>>> draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect, in which it is highlighted in the
>>>> IANA section the values whose early allocation is requested.
>>>>
>>>>   Should there be any issues with the IANA section, let the authors know
>>>> asap.
>>>>
>>>>    Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>>       Óscar
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> El 22/07/14 22:23, "Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]> escribió:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I approve.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please check that the IANA section of the draft is nice and clean so
>>>>> IANA
>>>>> can make the right allocations with no ambiguity.
>>>>> OR
>>>>> Wait a few days for me to have time to check the draft.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Adrian
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Lou Berger [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>>>>> Sent: 22 July 2014 23:18
>>>>>> To: [e-mail]
>>>>>> Cc: CCAMP
>>>>>> Subject: Fwd: Request for early IANA Allocation of values for new flag
>>>>>> and RRO
>>>>>> sub-object in draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adrian,
>>>>>> The WG chairs support the following early allocation request:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) In the "Attributes TLV Space" section of the "Resource Reservation
>>>>>> Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Parameters" registry located in
>>>>>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-te-
>>>>>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-te-parameters/rsvp-te-
>>>>>> parameters.xhtml>
>>>>>> parameters/rsvp-te-parameters.xhtml
>>>>>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-te-parameters/rsvp-te-
>>>>>> parameters.xhtml>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Type (value to be assigned)
>>>>>> Name SRLG Collection Flag
>>>>>> Allowed on LSP_ATTRIBUTES yes
>>>>>> Allowed on LSP_REQUIRED_ATTRIBUTES yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2) In the Sub-object type ‒ 21 ROUTE_RECORD portion of the Resource
>>>>>> Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Parameters registry located at
>>>>>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-parameters/rsvp-
>> parameters.xhtml:
>>>>>> Value: (value to be assigned) 34 is suggested to align with ERO
>>>>>> Description: SRLG sub-object
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3) In the "Error Codes and Globally-Defined Error Value Sub-Codes,
>>>>>> Sub-Codes ‒ 2 Policy Control Failure" section of the "RSVP PARAMETERS"
>>>>>> registry located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-parameters.
>>>>>> Value: (value to be assigned)
>>>>>> Description: SRLG sub-object
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you approve this request -- so that we can submit the request (per
>>>>>> stpe 5 of RFC7120)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> Lou (and Deborah)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>>> Subject:     Request for early IANA Allocation of values for new flag
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> RRO sub-object in draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05
>>>>>> Date:        Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:19:35 +0000
>>>>>> From:        OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS
>>>>>> <[e-mail]>
>>>>>> To:  Lou Berger <[e-mail]>, DEBORAH A BRUNGARD
>>>>>> <[e-mail]>
>>>>>> CC:  CCAMP <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear CCAMP WG Chairs,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Following the procedure for Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track
>>>>>> Code Points defined in Section 3.1 of RFC 7120, on behalf of the
>>>>>> authors
>>>>>> of the WG draft "RSVP-TE Extensions for Collecting SRLG Information",
>>>>>> draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05, it is requested to CCAMP WG
>>>>>> chairs the early allocation of the following values:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --> Value for a new flag, named "SRLG Collection Flag" in the RSVP
>>>>>> Attribute Bit Flags space. IANA has created a registry and manages the
>>>>>> space of attributes bit flags of Attribute Flags TLV, as described in
>>>>>> section 11.3 of [RFC5420], in the "Attributes TLV Space" section of
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> "Resource Reservation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
>>>>>> Parameters"
>>>>>> registry located in
>>>>>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-te-parameters/rsvp-te-
>>>>>> parameters.xhtml.
>>>>>> The document "RSVP-TE Extensions for Collecting SRLG
>>>>>> Information",draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05, introduces and
>>>>>> defines a new Attribute Bit Flag, named "SRLG Collection Flag". It is
>>>>>> requested that IANA makes an early assignment of the value of the
>>>>>> "SRLG
>>>>>> Collection Flag" from the Attribute Bit Flags.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --> Type for a new RRO sub-object, named "SRLG sub-object " within the
>>>>>> ROUTE_RECORD Object space. IANA has made assignments in the "Class
>>>>>> Names, Class Numbers, and Class Types" section of the "RSVP
>>>>>> PARAMETERS"
>>>>>> registry located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-parameters.
>>>>>> It
>>>>>> is requested that IANA makes an early assignment of the type of the
>>>>>> new
>>>>>> proposed RRO sub object in the document
>>>>>> draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05 named "SRLG sub-object" from
>>>>>> the ROUTE_RECORD portions of the mentioned registry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> —> Value for a new Policy Control Failure Error sub code. IANA has
>>>>>> made
>>>>>> assignments in the "Error Codes and Globally-Defined Error Value
>>>>>> Sub-Codes" section of the "RSVP
>>>>>> PARAMETERS" registry located at
>>>>>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-parameters. We request that IANA
>>>>>> makes an early assignment of a new error sub-code from the Policy
>>>>>> Control Failure Sub-Codes registry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The main reason for the request of the early allocation is to
>>>>>> facilitate
>>>>>> interoperability of early implementations, as other WG documents have
>>>>>> also new values in the same registry and clashes have been identified
>>>>>> with the suggested values in the draft.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oscar
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su
>>>>>> destinatario,
>>>>>> puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso
>>>>>> exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el
>>>>>> destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura,
>>>>>> utilización,
>>>>>> divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud
>>>>>> de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le
>>>>>> rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
>>>>>> proceda
>>>>>> a su destrucción.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and
>>>>>> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual
>>>>>> or
>>>>>> entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
>>>>>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>>>>>> distribution
>>>>>> or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>>>>> received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please
>>>>>> immediately
>>>>>> reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error
>>>>>> and then delete it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu
>>>>>> destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é
>>>>>> para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa
>>>>>> senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura,
>>>>>> utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida
>>>>>> em
>>>>>> virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro,
>>>>>> rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e
>>>>>> proceda a sua destruição
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CCAMP mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>>>> ________________________________
>>>>
>>>> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su
>>>> destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y
>>>> es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es
>>>> usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura,
>>>> utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar
>>>> prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este
>>>> mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por
>>>> esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.
>>>>
>>>> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and
>>>> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
>>>> entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
>>>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
>>>> or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>>> received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately
>>>> reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error
>>>> and then delete it.
>>>>
>>>> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu
>>>> destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é
>>>> para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa
>>>> senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura,
>>>> utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em
>>>> virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro,
>>>> rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e
>>>> proceda a sua destruição
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede
>> contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la
>> persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda
>> notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización
>> puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este
>> mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta
>> misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.
>>
>> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential
>> information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If
>> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
>> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please
>> immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in
>> error and then delete it.
>>
>> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário,
>> pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da
>> pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado,
>> fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização
>> pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem
>> por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via
>> e proceda a sua destruição
>