Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-info

["Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>]

Very good.

Thanks. I've asked for the last call and I will formally drop y comments to the
IETF list.

Two points...

> Should 6.5 also have a reference to ISIS TE?
> 
> YOUNG>> OK. RFC3784 added as normative reference.

That should be 5305,  I think.

> The question for section 8 is: are there any security elements that need to be
in
> your information model? Security qualities of links and nodes? Security
> capabilities of links and nodes?
> 
> YOUNG>> I am not sure what you are referring to. Can you elaborate some
> examples of security qualities/capabilities? Since this is informational
draft,
> perhaps the corresponding encode draft may be a good place for this.

The encode draft would be exactly the place to talk about the specifics. The
question is whether this draft should create the space to talk about the
specifics.

Maybe I am just dreaming and this should just be classified as "a future type of
metric" and nothing more needs to be said.

Thanks,
Adrian