Fw: WG Action: Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks (l1vpn)

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 29 June 2005 21:16 UTC

Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DnjvG-0002NE-Hd for ccamp-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:16:42 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA26364 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:16:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DnkKs-0000xi-FZ for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:43:12 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1Dnjnk-000I2a-29 for ccamp-data@psg.com; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:08:56 +0000
Received: from [80.168.70.141] (helo=relay1.mail.uk.clara.net) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1Dnjnh-000I26-42 for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:08:53 +0000
Received: from du-069-0190.access.clara.net ([217.158.132.190] helo=Puppy) by relay1.mail.uk.clara.net with smtp (Exim 4.46) id 1Dnjnd-000H2X-JE for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 22:08:51 +0100
Message-ID: <04b001c57cef$142e6520$c9919ed9@Puppy>
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Fw: WG Action: Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks (l1vpn)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 22:10:24 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=ham version=3.0.2
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: 1676547e4f33b5e63227e9c02bd359e3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

FYI
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: <IETF-Announce@ietf.org>
Cc: <l1vpn@ietf.org>; "Hamid Ould-Brahim" <hbrahim@nortel.ca>; "Adrian
Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; "Tomonori Takeda"
<takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:38 PM
Subject: WG Action: Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks (l1vpn)


> A new IETF working group has been formed in the Routing Area. For
additional
> information, please contact the Area Directors or the WG Chairs.
>
> +++
>
> Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks (l1vpn)
> ========================================
>
> Current Status: Active Working Group
>
> Chair(s):
> Hamid Ould-Brahim <hbrahim@nortel.ca>
> Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> Tomonori Takeda <takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
>
> Routing Area Director(s):
> Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
> Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
>
> Routing Area Advisor:
> Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
>
> Mailing Lists:
> General Discussion: l1vpn@ietf.org
> To Subscribe: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l1vpn
> Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l1vpn/index.html
>
> Description of Working Group:
> The L1VPN Working Group's task is to specify mechanisms necessary for
> providing layer-1 VPN services (establishment of layer-1 connections
> between CE devices) over a GMPLS-enabled transport service-provider
network.
>
> The following two service models will be addressed:
>
> 1. Basic mode: the CE-PE interface's functional repertoire is limited to
> path setup signalling only. Provider's network is not involved in
> distribution of customer network's routing information.
>
> 2. Enhanced mode: the CE-PE interface provides the signaling
> capabilities as in the Basic mode, plus permits limited exchange of
> information between the control planes of the provider and the customer
> to help such functions as discovery of reachability information in
> remote sites, or parameters of the part of the provider's network
> dedicated to the customer.
>
> The WG will work on the following items:
>
> 1. Framework document defining the reference network model, L1VPN
> service model, fundamental assumptions, and terminology.
>
> 2. Specification of the L1VPN signaling functionality between the
> customer and the provider network to support the basic mode.
>
> 3. Specification of the L1VPN signaling and routing functionality within
> the provider network to support the basic mode.
>
> 4. OAM features and MIB modules and/or extensions required for the basic
> mode.
>
> 5. Specification of the L1VPN signaling and routing functionality
> between the customer and the provider network to support the extended
mode.
>
> 6. Specification of the L1VPN signaling and routing functionality within
> the provider network to support the extended mode.
>
> 7. OAM features and MIB modules and/or extensions required for the
> extended mode.
>
> 8. Applicability guidelines to compare the basic and extended modes.
>
> At this point the WG will address the single-AS scenario only. The
> multi-AS/provider scenario may be considered in future.
>
> Protocol extensions required for L1VPN will be done in cooperation with
> MPLS, CCAMP, OSPF, IS-IS, IDR, L3VPN, and other WGs where necessary.
>
> L1VPN WG shall also cooperate with ITU-T SG13 through the established
> IETF process, and use documents Y.1312 and Y.1313 (describing L1VPN
> requirements and network architectures) as input to its design process.
> The documents will be available at the IETF liaison web-site.
>
> Goals and Milestones:
> Sep 05    Submit first Internet Draft of L1VPN framework
> Sep 05    Submit first Internet Drafts of basic mode specifications
> Dec 05    Submit first Internet Drafts of MIB modules for basic mode
> Apr 06    Submit basic mode specifications to IESG for publication as
Proposed
>           Standard
> Jun 06    Submit first Internet Drafts of enhanced mode specifications
> Aug 06    Submit MIB modules for basic mode to IESG for publication as
Proposed
>           Standard
> Dec 06    Submit enhanced mode specifications to IESG for publication as
>           Proposed Standard
> Dec 06    Submit L1VPN framework to IESG for publication as
Informational RFC
> Aug 07    Submit MIB modules for enhanced mode to IESG for publication
as
>           Proposed Standard
> Dec 07    Recharter or disband
>
>
>
>