[CCAMP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf-15: (with COMMENT)
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 03 August 2015 22:43 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76161AD34C; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ab93Ppt88cYo; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F461ACEE5; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.3.0.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150803224345.3041.26135.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 15:43:45 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/pFaILpcOU9F-ncelSCWH6Vc9rOI>
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf@ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org, ccamp-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 22:43:47 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 5 (security considerations) says: "This document does not introduce any further security issues other than those discussed in [RFC3630], [RFC4203]." While I don’t doubt the statement is true, it would be helpful to show the thought behind it. In this case, the draft adds new data elements to the OSPF TE LSA. Please consider adding a very short discussion on how the security implications of those elements is similar to or different from the previously existing data elements. Nits: Please expand TE and LSA on first mention. idnits thinks the reference to [G.694.1] is not cited in the body. Is the reference needed?