Re: [CCAMP] Process question on draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-00
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 08 November 2013 21:18 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A1911E80F6 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:18:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.724
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.724 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.541, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H7MkY8Q3ErE5 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:18:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (oproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.54.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E75811E80EC for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 16202 invoked by uid 0); 8 Nov 2013 21:17:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2013 21:17:44 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=L+owM9WH35IkKA8H/ivhSgulDpZcdAzWWpNqGTNxbEk=; b=VzGGgTr1GIDU0l2xjc+Skgie95B5yjnhX7e256U9RQJF0KGCtetm8AJBNPvylJ3OF8U3O7bfuSc9kYyNaIl5yGriaa79eJ7Xh9CHOgbK+cw7zzzgbPCw3UBHOi/T4VaT;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:42101 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1VetR2-0001f1-RG; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:17:44 -0700
Message-ID: <527D54F8.6080503@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:17:44 -0500
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
References: <CEA26D9C.820A2%zali@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CEA26D9C.820A2%zali@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Process question on draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-00
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:18:11 -0000
Zafar, Experimental. But of course that's assuming the WG agrees to take on this document. Lou On 11/08/2013 04:11 PM, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote: > Hi Adrian- > > We had a question for you during CCAMP meeting > on http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ali-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-00. > As G.Sup43 is a supplementary document, Lou mentioned that CCAMP can > assign code points but the draft cannot be standard track (would either > need to be experimental or BCP). To me experimental sounds a better fit. > What type of document this draft needs to be? Please advise. > > Thanks > > Regards … Zafar
- [CCAMP] Process question on draft-ali-ccamp-addit… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [CCAMP] Process question on draft-ali-ccamp-a… Lou Berger