RE: Drafts update
"Naidu, Venkata" <Venkata.Naidu@Marconi.com> Tue, 31 July 2001 15:37 UTC
Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 08:39:35 -0700
Message-ID: <39469E08BD83D411A3D900204840EC5554C651@VIE-MSGUSR-01>
From: "Naidu, Venkata" <Venkata.Naidu@Marconi.com>
To: "'ananth.nagarajan@mail.sprint.com'" <ananth.nagarajan@mail.sprint.com>, kireeti@juniper.net, rpapneja@osf1.gmu.edu
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org, "'te-wg@ops.ietf.org'" <te-wg@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Drafts update
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 11:37:53 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
All: I didn't understand why there is lot of confusion in TE drafts. To sum up... OSPF TE Draft is not part of any WG draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic-04.txt ISIS TE Draft is part of ISIS WG draft-ietf-isis-traffic-03.txt OSPF Diff TE Drafts are going in TE-WG draft-ietf-ospf-diff-te-00.txt draft-ietf-isis-diff-te-00.txt OSPF GMPLS are in CCAMP WG draft-kompella-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt ISIS GMPLS are in ISIS WG draft-ietf-isis-gmpls-extensions-03.txt I strongly suggest/request, all extensions related to OSPF and ISIS should go to respective (OSPF/ISIS) WGs. Because the extensions (TLVs etc) are closely related to the protocols (irrespective of the features - TE, Diffserv, GMPLS etc) --Venkata Naidu -> presumably because draft-ietf-isis-gmpls-extensions-03.txt (note 03, -> not 02) is already an ISIS WG document. -> -> -----Original Message----- -> From: rpapneja [mailto:rpapneja@osf1.gmu.edu] -> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 9:52 AM -> To: kireeti -> Cc: rpapneja; ccamp -> Subject: RE: Drafts update -> -> -> Hello Kireeti -> -> A correction- -> -> I meant to say why -> "draft-ietf-isis-gmpls-extensions-02.txt" did not -> make -> it to the list instead of "draft-ietf-isis-traffic-02.txt". -> -> -Rajiv -> -> On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Rajiv Papneja wrote: -> -> > Hello Kireeti, -> > -> > Here is my opinion on the list of proposed drafts: -> > -> > 1. draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt: -> {Yes} -> > (CCAMP WG documnet) -> > 2. draft-fontana-ccamp-gmpls-g709-00.txt: -> {Wait} -> > 3. draft-kompella-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt: {Yes} -> > 4. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-framework-00.txt - Yes: {Yes} -> > 5. -> draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-concatenation-conversion-00.txt: {Wait} -> > 6. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-routing-00.txt: {Yes} -> > -> > I was just wondering that why -> (draft-ietf-isis-traffic-02.txt) did -> not -> > make it to the list. Thanks. -> > -> > Regards, -> > -Rajiv -> > -> > ******************************** -> > Rajiv Papneja (GRA) -> > Advanced Internet Laboratory -> > George Mason University, -> > G10, Johnson Center, -> > Fairfax, VA 22030-4444 -> > Tel: 703.993.4703 -> > email: rpapneja@osf1.gmu.edu -> > ******************************** -> > -> > -> > > -----Original Message----- -> > > From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On > > Behalf Of Kireeti Kompella > > Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 5:37 AM > > To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org > > Subject: Drafts update > > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > Can we get a sense of the consensus whether the following drafts > > should be made CCAMP WG documents? Please respond with > > (a) yes > > (b) no > > (c) wait > > > > 1. draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt > > 2. draft-fontana-ccamp-gmpls-g709-00.txt > > 3. draft-kompella-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt > > 5. draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-concatenation-conversion-00.txt > > 6. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-routing-00.txt > > > > (Note: for draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt, the question is, should this > > be a WG document, either in MPLS or CCAMP.) > > > > Thanks, > > Kireeti. > > > > > > > > > > ******************************** Rajiv Papneja (GRA) Advanced Internet Laboratory George Mason University, G10, Johnson Center, Fairfax, VA 22030-4444 Tel: 703.993.4703 email: rpapneja@osf1.gmu.edu ********************************
- Drafts update Kireeti Kompella
- Re: Drafts update Zhi-Wei Lin
- RE: Drafts update Naidu, Venkata
- RE: Drafts update ananth.nagarajan
- RE: Drafts update John Drake
- RE: Drafts update Rajiv Papneja
- RE: Drafts update Rajiv Papneja
- Re: Drafts update Matt Squire
- RE: Drafts update Hirokazu Ishimatsu
- Re: Drafts update Zhi-Wei Lin
- RE: Drafts update Mannie, Eric
- Re: Drafts update Guangzhi Li
- Re: Drafts update Yangguang Xu
- Re: Drafts update Kireeti Kompella
- RE: Drafts update Martin Dubuc
- RE: Drafts update ananth.nagarajan
- Re: Drafts update Yangguang Xu
- RE: Drafts update dguo
- Re: Drafts update Eric Gray
- Re: Drafts update Kireeti Kompella
- Re: Drafts update Eric Gray
- RE: Drafts update Ayan Banerjee
- RE: Drafts update Yanhe Fan
- RE: Drafts update Vishal Sharma
- Re: Drafts update Siva Sankaranarayanan