[CCAMP] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-06.txt
Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr> Wed, 12 August 2020 10:39 UTC
Return-Path: <emmanuel.baccelli@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE893A11C2; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 03:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jg04TAwRdexi; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 03:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-f44.google.com (mail-ej1-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56BE13A0F6F; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 03:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-f44.google.com with SMTP id a26so1721147ejc.2; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 03:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1dmnDro+3GSdBybrtxzZrIcyPKKZEnUJpPrcHcgsMP4=; b=YQhbgeyKAkJSkn9KE82sEHK8KNbZaX6eACS9sgO324Mipj/OCBcatk2FY62fcqJoXK EH8xvR3uuiMmZOmn8mIvlJxVCcL9fmHTYhrDc3DGr33/dBxjmMtUHw7wsJSX+GCR+nHe 09Zj+dFltP7WVQF8DSFERNSaxFTk07kaf/U3Hc0JDOhnhD4D0zQ/V6ciHH58/GiDMdp4 sNn0rHuFUDkPHjwZkg8rSsFey2aTxmUzf/qvEPhrcIqirfnPDg6jdApr5Nd9I66khWgz 9DJPOuhZLFwhxmXiv74vweVT4WIovY69JWqxwT9FCt9c5x1vAhBF2Xx9DIwHtejrXm1r Y+TA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Ix5c+WfI6isMIdG/0zwOJSHg2VSode+CGf0Mnl6fgEVd6NaiS hLy5orytoft8nENNfKBJ/SFAI0TwEXvO0nmID8agFQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwUuMLO5KSl5gfKn809JajyIJVey7cEpZre/wGuIIHgUytNTubUbIvXoskBnO+qVsypCIuODdn0p/M+KVEVhLI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3b4e:: with SMTP id h14mr32121871ejf.546.1597228778563; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 03:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:39:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CANK0pbaqEBL56teR7uGjyye58xz_eC9PtN=dJ_9N=UqaG-_n=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<rtg-ads@ietf.org>" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types.all@ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f8aa7805acabcd65"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/yr45mvyUYZSL8Lk1G81w3vs7ruQ>
Subject: [CCAMP] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-06.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:39:45 -0000
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-06.txt Reviewer: Emmanuel Baccelli Review Date: Aug. 12th 2020 Intended Status: Proposed Standard Summary: No issues found. Comments: The draft is clear and readable, in the expected shape, as per RFC6087 as far as I can see (caveat: I am no YANG doctor). One comment on the security section, though: its content is pretty generic. Would concrete examples not be useful there, to get an idea? (e.g. what is the potential negative impact if data such as flexi-m or flexi-n are overwritten by a hostile entity?) Major Issues: No major issues found. Minor Issues: No minor issues found.
- [CCAMP] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-ccamp… Emmanuel Baccelli