[CCAMP] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext-03: (with COMMENT)

["Stephen Farrell" <[e-mail]>]

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


The IPR disclosure is dated one day after the date of the
current draft. That's kind of iccky in terms of the WG having
really had a chance to consider what they think of the IPR,
e.g. before a WGLC. Did the WG specifically consider this IPR
declaration in a way that left some trace?  (Sorry I've not had
time to check the list archive.)