Re: [CCWG] Harmony: A Congestion-free Datacenter Architecture

Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com> Fri, 05 April 2024 00:26 UTC

Return-Path: <helbakoury@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDEEC16943D for <ccwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 17:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KbQuf-k3nEsw for <ccwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 17:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF6E0C14F71A for <ccwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 17:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5cdbc4334edso1161053a12.3 for <ccwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 17:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712276766; x=1712881566; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AymvacZNa8KTuG5t5JK3gnHI9kU/Kr6fIshZkyTewQg=; b=KYQpwOpQVMExsfF+Slv8pZeuiixz18wpL6dEWcPHq/7Trf9Wk4r1TKkV3hL4uEAGwo JaZhXQkDOjMmSLniieet0+xDgALmjioCproKss584BuyVxhxQ+j2RQZgF5cjm2t4fVQ5 PMbamPbf9sf6qxn+NDPDhpQ0SzK8ukk4vdzvCFZ+B7+r8tpMt/+OnoW6yL0Mj2MYIWHR Xy01V7z9RYH+5GrC1dDVx2mVbEfJVmjdJgZc0Aj+gjpbwfU1QysAe+zeVk5xKUHnh2eO ANBBVMSPR2qGX10Go2NmsRpea5sXLuGYTQwQ35D37Bu+cqx31xDFG/IOpvXQkNoRqZkk 5TRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712276766; x=1712881566; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=AymvacZNa8KTuG5t5JK3gnHI9kU/Kr6fIshZkyTewQg=; b=oMWHaZh234Aky/lwyWTEGv9/9VZiXKImPYeqj77OmdISEP4BjknABxUiQpzPnEZme7 pd3zScZDih2fYjOTsQw9FfsNo2pJvgGcDBFxfboDqIJ9rX91xGCzI1g7qgqcgMTi0YNZ bz347J0Q+TFEKQ80lQiPkgA8256e8S2kjs2tgFckbOES2mVN9xmuZey1SnoQHHGp8z04 6ykhIfDI4e/Xmh2HTD93m3Wx7QuPnBv6myChCCnEOLjUL9HAhS8hMCQqdpwyA2XlYUWK MeH+2rB+kjmPQs3BlYMcPMoYmWDnMYdhEoVJzSKgkhAQS2oyLc30QfoLJGwiUgJ51rId grTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzRJiyk4xHGYrkgIusp04iDHSYft8jSVuWDfk3TPNijX7tctM6B AFNcUTyx0AGKgZX4K/YbPZqXwmdYLjOfLlNAKWC3qylmy0VufN12NT0Rq8SvN7AdpmTG9yhYbMK bB3YtegOyNk1PhmkWMmR0WLvh3e0gGOu+
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFGoJSFwdamfuQpdR6pi40KY2zxWnr6YEUPTKhvZPrVAia6blG2IDv8V6K0WKlrky58+4sVtfQOWZg2kmOdsw8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:297:b0:2a2:414b:ff78 with SMTP id az23-20020a17090b029700b002a2414bff78mr3793162pjb.44.1712276766151; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 17:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFvDQ9oJ=bwKh3ZJ3sWNWm4PWKSn+Cuce+rVNDNxkN9vLWpnkg@mail.gmail.com> <538ab299-9a1d-878a-59a7-8a11b8600e50@tenghardt.net>
In-Reply-To: <538ab299-9a1d-878a-59a7-8a11b8600e50@tenghardt.net>
From: Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 17:25:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFvDQ9o3_trHa=ezX6uCGg_9syrPXTpg=bT1+95Q_8+tjW-pHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Reese Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net>
Cc: ccwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000675b8d06154e8084"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccwg/8IPM5CNStc2HlXDteaENZ1KcXXk>
Subject: Re: [CCWG] Harmony: A Congestion-free Datacenter Architecture
X-BeenThere: ccwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Congestion Control Working Group <ccwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccwg>, <mailto:ccwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg>, <mailto:ccwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:26:10 -0000

Thanks Reese for pointing to this draft. I will certainly read it.

Hesham

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024, 4:54 PM Reese Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net> wrote:

> Hi Hesham,
>
> On 3/30/24 11:16, Hesham ElBakoury wrote:
> > This new paper [1] presents Harmony, "a datacenter network
> > architecture that provides “*congestion-free*” message delivery
> > guarantees with near-zero overheads compared to best-effort delivery
> > networks."
> > […]
>
> Thank you for pointing out this work, very interesting!
>
> At the CCWG session at IETF 119, we have had a great discussion on
> potential future work items, with lots of interest in working on
> solutions, especially congestion control algorithms. In addition, at the
> same session we've had quite a bit of discussion about data center
> congestion control and what considerations may go into standardizing
> algorithms here.
>
> If you haven't already, I invite you to read the most recent Editor's
> Copy of 5033bis, which lists a number of considerations that may go into
> CCWG's decision of whether to adopt a proposal in this space, should the
> authors decide to bring the work to CCWG:
>
>
> https://ietf-wg-ccwg.github.io/rfc5033bis/draft-ietf-ccwg-rfc5033bis.html#name-specifying-algorithms-for-u
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> Best,
> Reese
>
>