[CDNi] Fwd: ALTO extensions: new list + problem statement

Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it> Mon, 30 January 2012 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DBD21F8694 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:04:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.306, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79O2l3WKLg0P for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:04:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from GRFEDG702BA020.telecomitalia.it (grfedg702ba020.telecomitalia.it [156.54.233.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E570721F8686 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:04:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from GRFHUB701BA020.griffon.local (10.188.101.111) by GRFEDG702BA020.telecomitalia.it (10.188.45.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:06 +0100
Received: from MacLab.local (163.162.180.246) by smtp.telecomitalia.it (10.188.101.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:05 +0100
Message-ID: <4F26BFC4.8010203@telecomitalia.it>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:05:24 +0100
From: Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "cdni@ietf.org" <cdni@ietf.org>
References: <4F26BD49.8000009@telecomitalia.it>
In-Reply-To: <4F26BD49.8000009@telecomitalia.it>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <4F26BD49.8000009@telecomitalia.it>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms090506050604040009090408"
Subject: [CDNi] Fwd: ALTO extensions: new list + problem statement
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cdni>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:04:14 -0000

FYI -- The protocol extensions being discussed on the new altoext
mailing list are meant to address also the CDN usecase. Feedback from
people involved in the CDNI work will be surely useful and certainly
welcome.

Enrico

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: ALTO extensions: new list + problem statement
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:54:49 +0100
From: Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>
To: alto@ietf.org <alto@ietf.org>

Hi folks,

the new altoext@ietf.org mailing list has just been created to discuss
possible extensions to the about-to-be-finished ALTO protocol.

We have also recently submitted a draft trying to summarize the
previous discussions on the subject:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-marocco-alto-next

In a nutshell: the possible extensions, primarily intended to better
address the CDN/datacenter and server-to-server use cases, mainly
concern:
  + a server-to-client notification mechanism;
  + additional types of information, such as:
    o network link load (average, over some recent timeframe);
    o server load (average, over some recent timeframe);
    o availability of resources such as memory, content, installed
      applications.

The new mailing list has been created in order to get broader feedback
and to get together people with experience in different areas. If you
have an opinion on whether and why the proposed (and possibly further)
extensions will be a good or a bad idea, you can join the discussion
at: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/altoext

-- 
Ciao,
Enrico