[CDNi] New Version Notification for draft-cdni-fieau-lurk-https-delegation-00.txt

<frederic.fieau@orange.com> Fri, 08 July 2016 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <frederic.fieau@orange.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB56512B019 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pM8nOJ4hanfc for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 609B6127058 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by omfedm14.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id B0C7122CE6C for <cdni@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 22:02:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.57]) by omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 96147238092 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 22:02:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA1.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::95e2:eb4b:3053:fabf]) by OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::787e:db0c:23c4:71b3%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 22:02:52 +0200
From: frederic.fieau@orange.com
To: "cdni@ietf.org" <cdni@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-cdni-fieau-lurk-https-delegation-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHR2VJbR9x41DLwaEibbeC7kZmk8qAO8nKQ
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 20:02:52 +0000
Message-ID: <6423_1468008172_578006EC_6423_8217_1_1BD328329726EF4E91AE924BB1B4CB9E0FF94B93@OPEXCLILMA1.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <20160708195310.32172.23715.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160708195310.32172.23715.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2016.7.8.191516
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/8c22dczwXskAeIc60GGnxOdV_CY>
Subject: [CDNi] New Version Notification for draft-cdni-fieau-lurk-https-delegation-00.txt
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 20:02:57 -0000

Hi all,

I've just posted a new draft on the use of LURK (Limited Use of Remote Keys) for CDNI.

This draft presents two use cases regarding LURK in CDNI and is a first attempt to specify related requirements. It finally opens the discussion on several associated topics.

Thanks for your review.

Cheers,
Frederic

----



A new version of I-D, draft-cdni-fieau-lurk-https-delegation-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Frederic Fieau and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-cdni-fieau-lurk-https-delegation
Revision:	00
Title:		Limited Use of Remote Keys for Interconnected CDNs
Document date:	2016-07-08
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		17
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cdni-fieau-lurk-https-delegation-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cdni-fieau-lurk-https-delegation/
Htmlized:      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cdni-fieau-lurk-https-delegation-00


Abstract:
   Sharing private keys amongst administrative entities raises numerous
   issues for end-users, intermediaries and content origins.  The IETF
   envisions the standardization of protocols to limit the exchange of
   private keys (LURK).  This document presents CDN Interconnection
   (CDNI) use cases based on the Limited Use of Remote Keys (LURK)
   protocol and architecture and identifies a set of requirements.

                                                                                  




_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.