IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CDNi] AD review of draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05

"Ori Finkelman (IETF)" <ori.finkelman.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 14 August 2019 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <orifinkelman@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BC6120908; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r29vQWwjrddC; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe31.google.com (mail-vs1-xe31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA07E1201B7; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe31.google.com with SMTP id c7so244978vse.11; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4qKYGm2pYsXsJourEFgrQQgxZpG0sZ2x4ZuC4sanUQc=; b=FwfrVum6PcMTx7NhWnIYknlARq8nQZj1Kk2c7sAZKrNGyqfFOkUa/z+OcC6vaWXUSR EF0kF/XdrSP2qYVQ0bXMdeARjLsdYUpPVhAhxRVRfoAVsaclcG88K+DBNONw8RB6dhM0 /O84DqohSyOOCwB4/RRQUqoRplldGgzm1ZKVMC4KX8//8ZQO7qx66XtX4IhFgb8C2SaR trPp2VZnanHwWztC8pn3PWD4LFdMte4B/2d6qcpVG5T8LKQ18kMIb/tzbJ7NPnfNzXgU nkCLihSijYKIgXHhTApVrWV3OZa/FL7CYmRCAe0QjateGR7ETJdMC/pbpsVshRZ+zQqp Fw5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4qKYGm2pYsXsJourEFgrQQgxZpG0sZ2x4ZuC4sanUQc=; b=Fzl0AQJF8B3PgCK3AU1Jcs5wclTA2bH9VEJvRsQldpa8moHAULjjqNGtqoYkafIX8a 2TPRWLPwL6KA6CgX9llI+lwqwJ+iGONvLcImXOtWyCzYtdwbvS+wUt8gZyjW8hGmC/eW 4rJYD5QSFyRTTnHujFdNKTCWCWJ2F1OhFT6jSWqipiouGfLtqrRzfVjj57KcyBdCa1Ja tmpvUQScnN72SB9VJboo/I72w4hUkWKhNB8mssxry6oFtleq234tnWbY4597VJTIvufM ua5908wKZphUvpGWJPl148thp/ZK/sb4EaVaQLXg9FfTTrV8zmmP1NUC62qPOHvLIYfR WC7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV9gzdZ5hu2DqSW6UktgtwpTe4WwbRH/xC0eJD0l91Q8HfH7OmY nrhC75liku+4R/ZMhKFNMxJRNWeHxVZOshIDksA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw12K7MuA4tTs9pkO5xl08OHEsGqTeHD7ablfLUv7PqVw6Z1jDYBLrXAa+jSGX84uqadqq0Tz+UzW9XWNk4X3Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:7043:: with SMTP id l64mr1441242vsc.55.1565817885586; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJKLur6yP-uNof95qanEp5m90FD6-PePSiT_yBbsVjr5Ww@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKLur6yP-uNof95qanEp5m90FD6-PePSiT_yBbsVjr5Ww@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ori Finkelman (IETF)" <ori.finkelman.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 00:24:26 +0300
Message-ID: <CAM8emGV8WM+pbbxPEynK4chuJ_KuT6qYGA=bE=oUUydYEHC6Yg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions.all@ietf.org, "<cdni@ietf.org>" <cdni@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000da7a2905901a622d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/IJGig1EliQOHM8rbJvFubJGpjgI>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] AD review of draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 21:24:49 -0000

Thanks Barry for the comments.
I will submit a fixed version as soon as possible.

Best regards,
Ori

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:57 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
wrote:

> Thanks for the publication request for this document.  I have a few
> comments, none of which will block last call, so I'll request last
> call after I send this.  Please address these comments along with any
> last-call comments and those from the area review teams.
>
> 1. Please use the new BCP 14 boilerplate and references: see RFC 8174.
>
> 2. Abstract vs Introduction:  The sentence about the SVA seems out of
> place in the Abstract, and is oddly missing from the Introduction.  I
> would add the first two sentences of the Abstract to the Introduction.
> Then remove the first sentence from the Abstract and also remove “In
> that aspect,” from the second sentence.
>
> 3. RFC 6707 defines necessary terminology, so it probably should be
> normative.  I will note a downref in the last-call notice in
> anticipation of that.
>
> Barry
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email