Re: [CDNi] CDNI Use Cases

Grant Watson <watson.gm@gmail.com> Wed, 12 January 2011 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <watson.gm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E503A6A3D for <cdni@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:34:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V5HmoqdYpxBj for <cdni@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:34:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2225B3A6A8E for <cdni@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:34:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so978573wyf.31 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:37:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to:x-mailer; bh=gNCUVk9HTbffLN1VwpJTi86G5+YdzLMh6RKkOEJ2g+c=; b=GaGVS2nMW2jAi9nAM5wsmJm3OC87Nsrn9ZVavnn9mwxj+d3CdTgASj+TpVcmD2O/oD asWLUj4zoznFdqbfs9zCCQ39oRKnKqsv89aJdCCnE/vu5Ef67EJdjEfIicf58ovTSlYZ 0t11m21wZtv6yHlghE2/DxGg37gKaklxa3tnI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=J0uDBbmlgMoL649y4Xwlb67LNijUqQK2x5hZn4X0Bg8fxDVJcf3bZRLpZURVZpMTbw GOU3hHADFENcQAubBqwvNI9hSmdW0lwRPncQz4kVOCpzamEzTzZ00PqYdIvFv0R+4jaS gIHPoNp9Oc2ccfuLjp+2vO15tXl2bMLlmpdcU=
Received: by 10.216.162.84 with SMTP id x62mr1112520wek.106.1294861017421; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:36:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown.home (host86-153-71-222.range86-153.btcentralplus.com [86.153.71.222]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m6sm545530wej.34.2011.01.12.11.36.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:36:56 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Grant Watson <watson.gm@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110112101741.GA4876@pern.ankh.fr.EU.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:36:54 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <049C669A-286D-40A7-95D8-3DA2F1E8E48A@gmail.com>
References: <EE1234B4-10CB-46C0-A347-1DAD345D3FE7@gmail.com> <20110112101741.GA4876@pern.ankh.fr.EU.org>
To: Thomas Parmelan <thomas.parmelan@sfr.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: cdni@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CDNi] CDNI Use Cases
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cdni>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:34:50 -0000

Hi Thomas,

> The following use case is technically covered by the Use Cases in
> section 4 (for 2 CDNs/ISPs) and section 5 (for N CDNs/ISPs), but I think
> it is interesting to outline it separately:
> 
> There is a strong use case for a national CDN federation which would
> interconnect CDNs operated by the local ISPs within that territory.
> 
> Some local CSPs offer some content that is sometimes extremely popular
> within their country and needs to be delivered to a high proportion of
> End Users in that country regardless of their ISPs.  This may be because
> of language-related, cultural or other reasons.
> 
> A national CDN federation will allow both ISPs and CSPs to reduce their
> bandwidth and infrastructure needs (and costs), as well as providing End
> Users with a better experience due to the real proximity with their own
> ISP's CDN surrogates.
> 
> Would you be willing to add a subsection on that use case within your
> draft?  Let me know if you'd like me to suggest specific additional
> text.

As you say; I think the case is covered from a technical standpoint. However if there is sufficient justification for another use-case so this scenario can be captured in isolation I don't have a problem with that. The next revision is likely to be uplifted significantly so will look to capture as a separate scenario. 

Cheers.



On 12 Jan 2011, at 10:17, Thomas Parmelan wrote:

> Hello Grant,
> 
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 09:56:21PM +0000,
> Grant Watson <watson.gm@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-watson-cdni-use-cases-00.txt
> 
> The following use case is technically covered by the Use Cases in
> section 4 (for 2 CDNs/ISPs) and section 5 (for N CDNs/ISPs), but I think
> it is interesting to outline it separately:
> 
> There is a strong use case for a national CDN federation which would
> interconnect CDNs operated by the local ISPs within that territory.
> 
> Some local CSPs offer some content that is sometimes extremely popular
> within their country and needs to be delivered to a high proportion of
> End Users in that country regardless of their ISPs.  This may be because
> of language-related, cultural or other reasons.
> 
> A national CDN federation will allow both ISPs and CSPs to reduce their
> bandwidth and infrastructure needs (and costs), as well as providing End
> Users with a better experience due to the real proximity with their own
> ISP's CDN surrogates.
> 
> 
> Would you be willing to add a subsection on that use case within your
> draft?  Let me know if you'd like me to suggest specific additional
> text.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Tom
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Parmelan  -+-  thomas.parmelan@sfr.com