IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CDNi] Protocol names in draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-19 and draft-ietf-cdni-metadata

Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk> Fri, 20 May 2016 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC8712D62B for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iOka0KKPY6U6 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailex.mailcore.me (mailex.mailcore.me [94.136.40.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4512212D627 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 82-132-240-65.dab.02.net ([82.132.240.65] helo=[10.1.39.26]) by smtp04.mailcore.me with esmtpa (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>) id 1b3qwr-0000bu-Vz; Fri, 20 May 2016 21:23:06 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13C75)
In-Reply-To: <A419F67F880AB2468214E154CB8A556206DDCFE1@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 21:23:00 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <68CA6DB7-84A8-4AE2-9B47-96DF0F7335C1@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
References: <1463752842.3957746.613766209.00113288@webmail.messagingengine.com> <A419F67F880AB2468214E154CB8A556206DDCFE1@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
To: Kevin Ma J <kevin.j.ma@ericsson.com>
X-Mailcore-Auth: 9600544
X-Mailcore-Domain: 172912
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/JOwQpEgr7XBzzf6x6KsHBQAt5FE>
Cc: "cdni@ietf.org" <cdni@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] Protocol names in draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-19 and draft-ietf-cdni-metadata
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 20:23:10 -0000

It's fine with me too. Ben

> On 20 May 2016, at 15:06, Kevin Ma J <kevin.j.ma@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alexey,
> 
>  As an author, I do not have an issue with adding the slash.
> 
> thanx.
> 
> --  Kevin J. Ma
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: CDNi [mailto:cdni-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexey Melnikov
>> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 10:01 AM
>> To: cdni@ietf.org
>> Subject: [CDNi] Protocol names in draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-
>> semantics-19 and draft-ietf-cdni-metadata
>> 
>> Hi,
>> This is a minor point, but I am wondering if it is better to change
>> protocol names from "http1.1" and "https1.1" to "http/1.1" and
>> "https/1.1" in both documents? I think consistency with how http is
>> referenced elsewhere (e.g. the version number in HTTP itself) would be a
>> plus.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Alexey
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CDNi mailing list
>> CDNi@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CDNi mailing list
> CDNi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email