[CDNi] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-17: (with COMMENT)
"Alissa Cooper" <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 28 April 2016 14:33 UTC
Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietf.org
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A48812D7D1; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.19.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160428143358.27685.60505.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:33:58 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/PM1BW2e_HoMCYcF-LGPQX13fByI>
Cc: flefauch@cisco.com, cdni-chairs@ietf.org, cdni@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics@ietf.org
Subject: [CDNi] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:33:58 -0000
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-17: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for updating the document status. Will re-review when it comes back to the IESG. Leaving my comment below since I haven't re-reviewed yet. (2) Section 4: "For all of these mandatory-to-implement footprint types ..." seems like a misuse of the term "mandatory-to-implement." I thought this section was specifying requirements for the FCI which is to be specified, but this implies that all conforming implementations would also have to implement all of the footprint types (country code, AS, and IP prefix). Has that already been decided as well? If so, it could be explained more clearly in the text.
- [CDNi] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf… Alissa Cooper