Re: [CDNi] CDNI BOF

Here is the IETF WG info:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/alto/charter/

Started as a way to control P2P traffic:

http://cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/yong/p4p.html

It has evolved to control CDN as well

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-penno-alto-cdn-03.txt

Hope it helps!

- Ping

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:22 AM, SAYKO, ROBERT J (ATTSI) <rs1983@att.com>wrote:

> Francois, Ping,
>
> Can either of  you point me to a resource to learn about ALTO?  No one
> here at AT&T (that I have spoken with) has any clue as to what that is.
>
> Regards,
> Bob
>
>
> Robert Sayko
> AT&T Labs
> 732-420-3292
> sayko@att.com
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdni-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:cdni-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Francois Le Faucheur
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:19 AM
> To: Ping Pan
> Cc: cdni@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [CDNi] CDNI BOF - draft minutes posted for comments
>
> Hi Ping,
>
> On 7 Apr 2011, at 14:49, Ping Pan wrote:
>
> > Hi, Francois,
> >
> > Thanks for the notes.
> >
> > I take the following is an accurate description of the work to be done
> here, correct?
>
> Let's say that:
>        * this is an accurate description of what a lot of the people
> involved in the CDNI effort believe
>        * the proposed charter is drafted in line with that assumption
>
> In particular, the proposed draft charter
> (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/80/slides/cdni-9.txt) currently says:
> "
> It is expected that the CDNI interfaces will be realized using existing
> IETF protocols for transport and message exchange, and using existing
> object notation grammars/languages for the definition of CDNI objects
> and semantics. In the event that protocol extensions or new protocols
> are deemed necessary by the WG, the WG will recharter.
> "
>
> Cheers
>
> Francois
>
> >
> > + Francois: we say that we need only to define several schema. If we
> need ALTO extensions this still only requires work on schema and not
> definition of new protocol or protocol extensions per say (whether done
> in CDNI WG or in ALTO WG).
> > + Bruce Davie: it is pretty clear that CDNI does not require protocol
> work (ie only schema definition).
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > - Ping
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Francois Le Faucheur
> <flefauch@cisco.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Draft CDNI BOF minutes are available from the IETF meeting materials
> website:
> > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/80/minutes/cdni.txt
> >
> > Please provide corrections & comments as needed.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Francois & Richard
> >
> > PS: thanks to Emile for providing his notes as the basis for these
> minutes.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CDNi mailing list
> > CDNi@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CDNi mailing list
> CDNi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
>