Re: [CDNi] Scheduled operations: draft-finkelman-cdni-sva-extensions-00.txt

Ori Finkelman <orif@qwilt.com> Wed, 29 November 2017 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <orif@qwilt.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B059126B72 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:59:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=qwilt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6EhxUB5YRqeV for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:59:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com (mail-ua0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95AB612009C for <cdni@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:59:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id w47so3846008uah.3 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:59:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qwilt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ikd//d8gBGe1Q6aix8jieFWmLmENvy/9LJDYCSOF/Ao=; b=dpDs5mk2NG+SIlsdbJxf4MASV0kXKhdfA7ivzx5LqJ4SaGFCmA2zu2Dse1DcuVOHpF 23PHFLShNYl37q8kOaJBIgA9PeEQtaH7zL1lNtWy3WpwtG2Skt4Ho4heiQfgJPlMWSBK gyR3pImSDIXynoTxw+DWoBYheB4qTtgk8Ko3UtdqPrMdNbvfWZrf9iOXA+jcPlGHF8Fv XMf0Qm+hemHjZdMak/SBmiv0c/yHKTc+PqSE49KRJbEuIkIMgoYQ88f/HokjGzJ9vaQs fm7oE4F1RlafTUttndXsvPyJE9qWocLnfTJfJyfVFWNlITTo0R44LFRyFchWMnsBmd2t gZIg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ikd//d8gBGe1Q6aix8jieFWmLmENvy/9LJDYCSOF/Ao=; b=gWP6WJOAYPF1gqH/XwQZ8EaXR1qgycniUn3/emmulO090E07NZmOO1we7vVi4gRJR+ qQqbvnZfDaEc2M/mWRbZQ2XtYuf+FTbbdqbp7f47rsOSMKhxZKuEyxdLTp6butI2EvQK hnsLPzLBhijHbpwWTu2FiI+VeQJc3I/fq7bbfVXQYDoMw6360thYQV8AGLDR5fsM3t9I qQyDK7ipP6Asxqyadl8xhpf27JJc5YQLpl28Ak1fbLinlIk2o1T1aK+8XcCNxmL9pBJe Y8pjJCnniYBIut3TnKmMcIoM2Y1Iml4ohjkN9bfZnXzYRocu9o/asHJNrhgtAXoV3oZH s08w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5I2KpETek41D4O1+8KHfBMPJTn4jNO1fAJNlNw6lr12oeFpVKU eMrA35hW5bYUtonTIcdSCaPx20DZsRLA6RJXA80P7w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMap1HGR4hpgiUyGGy4+jyLC0FN9jYGcpGa8UisBSClCpPvrzhF6Lc5SH5WkTiNiImzkGhRkuJzLQXQqpoQKfGY=
X-Received: by 10.176.29.147 with SMTP id l19mr2514442uak.37.1511974772681; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:59:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.171.7 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:59:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <88440207-7E60-4A6C-97E5-55B21C45D80F@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
References: <88440207-7E60-4A6C-97E5-55B21C45D80F@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
From: Ori Finkelman <orif@qwilt.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:59:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMb9nTsSMtFW48WxuPxdKhjnzpySZ=CPOFN7gOg_MkH9LV26rw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
Cc: "<cdni@ietf.org>" <cdni@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e08264cd83c455e055f220f65"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/SnN3vFuX-P90aM1hntWMh_fMZCQ>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] Scheduled operations: draft-finkelman-cdni-sva-extensions-00.txt
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:59:35 -0000

Hi Ben,
I fully agree, the option to use the geography instead of local time was
raised by Phil Sorber at the IETF meeting, and I am in favor.
I will remove the local time option.

Thanks,
Ori

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
wrote:

> HI Ori & Colleagues,
>
> I do not see anything in the use case described in section 3.3 (scheduled
> operations) that requires the local time support the draft proposes.
>
> What does local time give over and above the ability to pre-position by
> geographic region, given that timezones are defined geographically?
>
> Thanks
> Ben
>
>


-- 

*Ori Finkelman*Qwilt | Work: +972-72-2221647 | Mobile: +972-52-3832189 |
orif@qwilt.com