IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CDNi] Confirming some IETF-85 decisions

ramki Krishnan <ramk@Brocade.com> Wed, 21 November 2012 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ramk@Brocade.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9507421F8818 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:47:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.359, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YTWlU8dum7RN for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:47:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-000f0801.pphosted.com (mx0b-000f0801.pphosted.com [67.231.152.113]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0866421F879C for <cdni@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:47:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0000700 [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-000f0801.pphosted.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id qALKlnAe020877; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:47:51 -0800
Received: from hq1wp-exchub01.corp.brocade.com ([144.49.131.13]) by mx0b-000f0801.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 18rjkp0s56-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:47:50 -0800
Received: from HQ1WP-EXHUB01.corp.brocade.com (10.70.36.14) by HQ1WP-EXCHUB01.corp.brocade.com (10.70.36.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:48:43 -0800
Received: from HQ1-EXCH01.corp.brocade.com ([fe80::ed42:173e:fe7d:d0a6]) by HQ1WP-EXHUB01.corp.brocade.com ([::1]) with mapi; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:47:49 -0800
From: ramki Krishnan <ramk@Brocade.com>
To: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com>, "cdni@ietf.org" <cdni@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:47:42 -0800
Thread-Topic: Confirming some IETF-85 decisions
Thread-Index: AQHNx8+pxDEjRjrDOki2Ny1w43ylTZf0worw
Message-ID: <C7634EB63EFD984A978DFB46EA5174F2BF4F9AF009@HQ1-EXCH01.corp.brocade.com>
References: <FC236DA6F2DA77449EF2D02DF4471A8D251496@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <FC236DA6F2DA77449EF2D02DF4471A8D251496@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8185, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-11-21_04:2012-11-21, 2012-11-20, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1207200000 definitions=main-1211210225
Subject: Re: [CDNi] Confirming some IETF-85 decisions
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cdni>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 20:47:52 -0000

Dear Francois,

We are incorporating the feedback from the meeting (from you, Kevin and others) in coming up with 
(a) more information on relevance of LTC (long-tail content ) to CDNI 
(b) a solution for the LTC problem without any new requirements in the CDNI interfaces. 
 
Our target for the LTC support over CDNI is a best practices draft which provides guidance to vendors and operators on how to manage LTC deliver effectively and efficiently.
 
We expect to send this document out for review in the next 3-4 weeks and request you to continue supporting this as a working group topic.

Thanks, 
Ramki (on behalf of long-tail co-authors)

-----Original Message-----
From: cdni-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:cdni-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 2:05 AM
To: cdni@ietf.org
Subject: [CDNi] Confirming some IETF-85 decisions

All,

As documented in the minutes, the following decisions were tentatively made at IETF-85:

	* Content Deduplication: The WG will continue the work on this topic inside the WG, but will not aim to support it in first version of the CDNI interfaces.

	* Long Tail Content: The WG will not continue the work on this topic inside the WG for now (at least not as a priority item) and will not aim to support something specific for it in first version of the CDNI interfaces.

	* CDNI Logging: draft-bertrand-cdni-logging is accepted as WG document

We will consider these decisions confirmed unless we hear substantiated objections by 30 Nov.

Cheers

Francois & Rich
_______________________________________________
CDNi mailing list
CDNi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email