[CDNi] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-cdni-edge-control-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)

[Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-cdni-edge-control-metadata-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-edge-control-metadata/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to Elwyn Davies for the GENART review.

I support the DISCUSS positions of Christopher Inacio, Mahesh Jethanandani, and
Mohamed Boucadair on the how the [WHATWG-FETCH] reference is treated -- it
needs to be normative and point to a specific reference.

In previous discussions on WHATWG references in documents, specific github
commit messages with a date stamp were referenced.