IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CDNi] SVA extensions next drafts

Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org> Tue, 06 February 2018 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <sorber@apache.org>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE05C12D833 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 07:51:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.929
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.929 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fzmtgM7WT5VL for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 07:51:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 13E69126D73 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 07:51:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 28477 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2018 15:51:06 -0000
Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 15:51:06 +0000
Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com (mail-io0-f169.google.com [209.85.223.169]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id E871F1A0044 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 15:51:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id f34so2931221ioi.13 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 07:51:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCQXZVGbKIllWYOegPLc+V2cXISLwjr2G6nviZhPrxllpvOr9Zu zGhetO+isH9G5Jvk2Jhmv/UUN8rt7MCfReoDYGM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226Xo40bkSr56OeBi9CC3sbwWrdjhL9ilTAf75j9j7S3jCFMUkjCifrXx+I+dguGARQlEtk1CgofP7ARroCY8c4=
X-Received: by 10.107.22.199 with SMTP id 190mr3804616iow.242.1517932265301; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 07:51:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMb9nTsKi==-5Lpeq7Ccm6pdQAov1UfuDNshPQJYJLXPhCs-Pg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMb9nTv7YWJeA=r4xQw9TNxwtGr6dZPqAG+1hAAuinzYJKRVMA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMb9nTv7YWJeA=r4xQw9TNxwtGr6dZPqAG+1hAAuinzYJKRVMA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 15:50:54 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CABF6JR0bZMOLRXWTi3-ABf4DY2zWBFo9xv+j97wAGgtE9wJm7A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABF6JR0bZMOLRXWTi3-ABf4DY2zWBFo9xv+j97wAGgtE9wJm7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ori Finkelman <orif@qwilt.com>
Cc: "<cdni@ietf.org>" <cdni@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1148e120776e9d05648d25e8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/_zwGrmGl2VuIHUrujNr8dpIMl5I>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] SVA extensions next drafts
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 15:51:14 -0000

As an individual, I like the idea of the split. As long as the overhead of
having that many drafts in the air isn't too much. Keeps all the concerns
separate.

As a chair, that's a lot more to shepherd but I think that's still fine. It
means we can make progress on different drafts instead of it being held up
in one giant monolithic draft.

Thanks.

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:41 AM Ori Finkelman <orif@qwilt.com> wrote:

> Also,
> I am planning to draft the trigger extensions and the triggers capability
> objects as a separate draft for extension of RFC8007.
>
> Best regards,
> Ori
>
> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 3:42 PM, Ori Finkelman <orif@qwilt.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I am planning to split the current SVA open caching draft
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-finkelman-cdni-sva-extensions-00 into
>> separate functions.
>> + request routing
>> + content management (triggers)
>> + URI signing
>> + CORS delegation
>> + Logging
>> each will have its own draft, shorter and easier to review and edit.
>>
>> Let me know if there are any reservations.
>> Best regards,
>> Ori
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Ori Finkelman*Qwilt | Work: +972-72-2221647 <072-222-1647> | Mobile:
>> +972-52-3832189 <052-383-2189> | orif@qwilt.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Ori Finkelman*Qwilt | Work: +972-72-2221647 <+972%2072-222-1647> |
> Mobile: +972-52-3832189 <+972%2052-383-2189> | orif@qwilt.com
> _______________________________________________
> CDNi mailing list
> CDNi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email