IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CDNi] URI Signing Signed Token Chaining refactor

Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org> Wed, 19 July 2017 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <sorber@apache.org>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D5712EC46 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 06:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.421
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.421 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eClSRr9Ml1Sq for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 06:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E4CDD129B10 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 06:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 78718 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2017 13:43:23 -0000
Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:43:23 +0000
Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com (mail-it0-f41.google.com [209.85.214.41]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 6019E1A031E for <cdni@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:43:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-it0-f41.google.com with SMTP id a62so662849itd.1 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 06:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110ZjCQYTv2cScMLpZd7CvdzEtpfUy+iY+UFQyGsPnE4bDErTO3I FkJL9Q+FRhyvNMPyFgd6uRR35csTPA==
X-Received: by 10.36.213.135 with SMTP id a129mr202858itg.50.1500471800875; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 06:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:43:09 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CABF6JR3wEfUoCSJ29xQ3n56Ah1EqPnCvkZ4x6W5_cTW8V35Hwg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABF6JR3wEfUoCSJ29xQ3n56Ah1EqPnCvkZ4x6W5_cTW8V35Hwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "cdni@ietf.org" <cdni@ietf.org>
Cc: Ray van Brandenburg <ray@tiledmedia.com>, "Thomas, E.D.R. (Emmanuel)" <emmanuel.thomas@tno.nl>, Matthew Miller <linuxwolf@outer-planes.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c05ffa2aff9c50554abd057"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/augNb2FIi6MGbANhwLVYEhJsRDQ>
Subject: [CDNi] URI Signing Signed Token Chaining refactor
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:43:28 -0000

Since we have added the HAS content I have been thinking about how specific
we have made it. Perhaps just specifying a method for token chaining, and
then citing HAS as a use case makes more sense. I wanted to get some
opinions on it before I make those changes. It shouldn't be that big of a
change, just taking the HAS specific stuff and putting it in a lower "Use
Case" sub-section at the bottom and leaving everything else as a "Signed
Token Chaining" section.

Thoughts?

Thanks.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email