Re: [CDNi] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8006 (7657)

[Kevin Ma <[e-mail]>]

Hi All,

  The Errata below was submitted against RFC8006.  It correctly notes that
the time window json example in section 6.10 is not correct.  It is correct
in section 4.2.3, but somehow was messed up in 6.10.  Note: section 7.1.12
normatively points to section 4.2.3, so that's good; section 6.10 is really
just informational.

  I am inclined to verify the errata unless anyone disagrees.

  Thank you to Kazuki Takashima for reporting the error.

thanx!

--  Kevin J. Ma

-----

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8006,
"Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Metadata".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7657

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Kazuki Takashima <[e-mail]>
<&lt;[e-mail]&gt;>

Section: 6.10

Original Text
-------------
   {
     "metadata": [
       {
         "generic-metadata-type": "MI.TimeWindowACL",
         "generic-metadata-value": {
           "times": [
             "windows": [
               {
                 "start": "1213948800",
                 "end": "1478047392"
               }
             ],
             "action": "allow"
           ]
         }
       }
     ]
   }

Corrected Text
--------------
   {
     "metadata": [
       {
         "generic-metadata-type": "MI.TimeWindowACL",
         "generic-metadata-value": {
           "times": [
              {
                "windows": [
                  {
                    "start": 1213948800,
                    "end": 1478047392
                  }
                ],
                "action": "allow"
              }
           ]
         }
       }
     ]
   }

Notes
-----
1. The "times" property of  the TimeWindowACL object has an array of
TimeWindowRule type, so I changed it to "windows" and "action" are
contained in braces.
2. The "start" and "end" property of the TimeWindow object have a Time
type, which is an alias of Integer. So I changed their values
("1213948800", "1478047392") to Integer (1213948800, 1478047392).

The examples in sections 4.2.3 and 4.2.3.* seems to be correct as
defined in this RFC.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC8006 (draft-ietf-cdni-metadata-21)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Metadata
Publication Date    : December 2016
Author(s)           : B. Niven-Jenkins, R. Murray, M. Caulfield, K. Ma
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Content Delivery Networks Interconnection
Area                : Applications and Real-Time
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG