IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CDNi] next steps with draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-03.txt

"Kevin J. Ma" <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 08 August 2019 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732C91200E9 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UEwV6OdNhyuT for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E6D51200A3 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id h21so93242598qtn.13 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 11:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=udp6dJ+KHpDyYCNBm9vutGnCcnZnY+tlOv8vFTxucUI=; b=rZoVgrzrU5KROcw3eJvtWTKULdqaaydxqchfpAop2qhCTg16ThkD8WAiOnAt7m58s2 LB+e0zqTv0SrCVKPrQXjdNloyv1sIJyUGzZqqdKXCQvgS1QtDQ1J9G0w/FjRNfH8OtIs GuPS5v/av2N3iIgu7avGYCHiFP2mz1v+wnxxom2XnpIhj+lacTlDTP9A4RYXaG56cUlR 4fdEGJuXuQ5uULxxZ1G0QFSVjsKxhCPbzHLAKKAlO5gsLJIYBMyUbx4D9rnIypNXJcnw Lryc5X3YWYEeZGVz1r68rlZc50pXLe2dGSz+UZbqqv6H5pczEKmFB9eDYTaOepZLrHbe dZow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=udp6dJ+KHpDyYCNBm9vutGnCcnZnY+tlOv8vFTxucUI=; b=EZf4QfvKiGoa6DkZu9zkaZI2lKeEPTFo04SitEVLzSOK9VD++vZM2mfx7V5duq3q6l OESdDOzjgI+Ptctf90uJ314yTF4+saeqIqrP2gAinpWRKmSOQX4H9EuyO526o5FvzNg0 2CU1CMOCow/R2N/4U2DnPGmgJnK54vf24+WCjIMAzbAvgltHY+394rgSZQ6FEl4+uqqo var+EJ1lZYLmTz1xOyelqKW8URIYM3ndN+vPxKBoEM/RjSj601Sf/AxdH5wtHm5wJ0QU SHj7ShBEaPMIz4MaxmjLUnBCt1BUap9tjlub+i4htCT/SspkcbEiXH/KpBL8K+1uCtG8 wLhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXcREGTzWFn/+QgLv+xkQZERMfF/Qk2+AfRdSibF24+14f5I1DS Y34PvV9mZeY7RweG8nZrgn0GoLmH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwg1Jei2CpMwTevwMWdR7kRNGXvUO0js74DUbsdSpVU7efQiHsU70OBzfusdPNnpAYZ/WP4qQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:983b:: with SMTP id c56mr14938306qvd.131.1565290545416; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 11:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.128] (static-173-48-106-234.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [173.48.106.234]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z1sm47146304qkg.103.2019.08.08.11.55.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Aug 2019 11:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-0E1BD263-1E26-447A-A4DA-90B7C451A97B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: "Kevin J. Ma" <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G77)
In-Reply-To: <CAM8emGXUxbzj4dEi=QG5Gv0w1SZaWsNMFhoC=B81Ek+GzOc4HA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 14:55:43 -0400
Cc: sanjay.mishra=40verizon.com@dmarc.ietf.org, "cdni@ietf.org" <cdni@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <5E60A6DC-8273-4548-93DC-DCFAFE9657D1@gmail.com>
References: <bb476a3ad2934dd6a8d6db4f2fc45202@tbwexch02apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com> <CAMrHYE3yP+CKrPAFgfegt=svuKnK1rpy9d1=EkMVNw54_VA2Vw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8emGXwySixUVXZfhDhVYnXuo0Ud==+HAYRsmKQnDTUMWWU+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAMrHYE26yNg9-_jVqdn2X+jp2XU3wZirbCYWZLtAi_RP_vYUXQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8emGXUxbzj4dEi=QG5Gv0w1SZaWsNMFhoC=B81Ek+GzOc4HA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ori Finkelman (IETF)" <ori.finkelman.ietf@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/hUckMnvATzXbTL6QDWQ8U5jEYV0>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] next steps with draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-03.txt
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 18:55:50 -0000

Hi Ori,

  Understood.  I think for the purposes of this document .ucdn.example.com and .dcdn.example.com should be ok and make things simpler with not having to explain nits.

thanx!

--  Kevin J. Ma

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 8, 2019, at 1:54 PM, Ori Finkelman (IETF) <ori.finkelman.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Kevin,
> I am aware of that, the thing is that for this example we need two separate domains, one of the uCDN and the other of the dCDN, putting them both under the same domain example.com defeats the purpose.
> 
> Maybe we can put them as ucdn.example.com and dcdn.example.net ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ori
> 
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 4:06 AM Kevin Ma <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ori,
>> 
>>   IDnits notes one issue: non-RFC2606-compliant FQDNs
>>   https://www6.ietf.org/tools/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-04.txt
>> 
>>   I'm guessing it's: service123.ucdn.example.dcdn.com, which doesn't end in .example.com ?
>> 
>>   Do you think we can fix that?
>> 
>> thanx!
>> 
>> --  Kevin J. Ma
>> 
>> 
>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 5:26 AM Ori Finkelman (IETF) <ori.finkelman.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks Kevin.
>>> I will wait for group comments and will publish an updated version with the comments you have sent here.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Ori
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:38 AM Kevin Ma <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Sanjay,
>>>> 
>>>>   The updates look good.  Two final comments:
>>>>   - section 2.1: "non empty" -> "non-empty"
>>>>   - sections 6/7: if there are no acknowledgements or contributors, those two sections can just be removed.
>>>> 
>>>>   Those comments notwithstanding, I think we can start the WGLC.
>>>> 
>>>> thanx..
>>>> 
>>>> --  Kevin J. Ma
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 9:20 AM <sanjay.mishra=40verizon.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>>>> Since there is no CDNI meeting on the agenda, I wanted to ask if chairs have any additional questions or questions in the mailing list towards advancing draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-03.txt to WGLC?
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sanjay
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CDNi mailing list
>>>>> CDNi@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CDNi mailing list
>>>> CDNi@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email