Re: [CDNi] Adoption of draft-leung-cdni-uri-signing as a WG document

<iuniana.oprescu@orange.com> Mon, 12 May 2014 11:42 UTC

Return-Path: <iuniana.oprescu@orange.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0141A0675 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 May 2014 04:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2wVsg8T3vhMI for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 May 2014 04:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias243.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C24F1A069B for <cdni@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 May 2014 04:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfeda05.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.198]) by omfeda10.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 47E773743AB; Mon, 12 May 2014 13:42:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PMEXCH41.intranet-paris.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.100.76.22]) by omfeda05.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 2B3AE180053; Mon, 12 May 2014 13:42:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PMEXCB1D.intranet-paris.francetelecom.fr ([10.100.76.13]) by PMEXCH41.intranet-paris.francetelecom.fr ([10.100.76.22]) with mapi; Mon, 12 May 2014 13:42:25 +0200
From: iuniana.oprescu@orange.com
To: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com>, "cdni@ietf.org" <cdni@ietf.org>, "draft-leung-cdni-uri-signing@tools.ietf.org" <draft-leung-cdni-uri-signing@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 13:42:24 +0200
Thread-Topic: Adoption of draft-leung-cdni-uri-signing as a WG document
Thread-Index: AQHPafo7Fm/bsUFZ3ka0x9geqEbs1Zs82iRw
Message-ID: <28917_1399894946_5370B3A2_28917_4019_1_8F0D2F5E4AAB7249BC7339A3E944DEDD2284B99D21@PMEXCB1D.intranet-paris.francetelecom.fr>
References: <CE2B6E63-3F1F-40D2-8880-B9DD0798A855@cisco.com> <BDC9627D-FE53-4A6B-95AD-4D678F72F74E@cisco.com> <D0F7064D-D074-4098-AF9D-61E4BDFE3ABB@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D0F7064D-D074-4098-AF9D-61E4BDFE3ABB@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8F0D2F5E4AAB7249BC7339A3E944DEDD2284B99D21PMEXCB1Dintra_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.5.12.2118
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/je5meS621CUNBjjC7YhBQrsKiHo
Subject: Re: [CDNi] Adoption of draft-leung-cdni-uri-signing as a WG document
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 11:42:44 -0000

Someone pointed out it should have been RFC 6890 for documentation IP ranges.

My humble excuses,
-- iuniana

De : CDNi [mailto:cdni-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)
Envoyé : mercredi 7 mai 2014 15:43
À : cdni@ietf.org; draft-leung-cdni-uri-signing@tools.ietf.org
Objet : [CDNi] Adoption of draft-leung-cdni-uri-signing as a WG document

Folks,
In addition to the support expressed in London, we've heard as a result of the list poll:
* statements of strong support (Kevin, Matt, Scott, Daryl)
* a statement of conditional support (Ben)
* no objection/concern.
So we (WG Chairs) confirm adoption of draft-leung-cdni-uri-signing as a WG document, conditioned to resolution of Ben's comments.

To draft authors,
Please continue the discussion (on the WG mailer) with Ben to converge on how to best address his comments, and then post a new version of the draft as draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-00.

Cheers

Francois

On 25 Apr 2014, at 16:51, Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch) <flefauch@cisco.com<mailto:flefauch@cisco.com>> wrote:


Folks,

Just to be clear, this is a follow up from Daryl's earlier message of 25 April (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cdni/current/msg01837.html), which issued a similar request. We did not received much feedback so would like to give another opportunity for more feedback.

Francois

Begin forwarded message:


From: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com<mailto:flefauch@cisco.com>>
Subject: [CDNi] Poll for adoption of draft-leung-cdni-uri-signing-05 as a WG document
Date: 25 April 2014 16:30:08 CEST
To: "cdni@ietf.org<mailto:cdni@ietf.org>" <cdni@ietf.org<mailto:cdni@ietf.org>>

Folks,

During the London meeting:
* authors confirmed that they believe the latest version of draft-leung-cdni-uri-signing resolved the issue related to draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-04.txt.
* WG chairs agreed to take to the list the question of adopting draft-leung-cdni-uri-signing-05 as a WG document to ensure it gets sufficient review.

This message is to encourage review of draft-leung-cdni-uri-signing-05 (http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-leung-cdni-uri-signing-05.txt) and sollicite feedback on adopting it as a WG document to address the corresponding milestone on our charter.
Please do so by end of 12 May (ie within the next 2 weeks).

Francois & Daryl, CDNI WG Chairs



For convenience, quote from IETF-89 CDNI WG meeting minutes :
"
Daryl (as chair): This is a deliverable on our charter, but not many people have read the draft yet, so will take question for WG adoption to the list to give people time to read it.
"


For convenience, relevant excerpt from the CDNI WG charter (http://tools.ietf.org/wg/cdni/charters):
"
The working group will focus on the following items:
<...>
 - A specification for "CDNI URI Signing". This document will specify a
   mechanism that allows interconnected CDNs to support access control
   by signing content URIs. This may involve extensions to the CDNI
   interfaces (e.g. CDNI Metadata interface, CDNI Logging interface).

<...>

Goals and Milestones:
<...>
 Sep 2014 - Submit specification of URI Signing for CDNI to IESG as Proposed Standard
"
_______________________________________________
CDNi mailing list
CDNi@ietf.org<mailto:CDNi@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni

_______________________________________________
CDNi mailing list
CDNi@ietf.org<mailto:CDNi@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.