Re: [CDNi] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types

Jensen Zhang <jingxuan.n.zhang@gmail.com> Wed, 06 July 2022 00:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jingxuan.n.zhang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32909C15C6A7; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 17:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wuQJ-frJ7_Up; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 17:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa1-x30.google.com (mail-oa1-x30.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03F18C15C6A9; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 17:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa1-x30.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-10c0430e27dso7987740fac.4; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 17:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=I2hr1ux1I8k6CzIV+FuN8uImbCIr2dZgJtKmOFSBsgM=; b=aVHne++wAKEUHjZzFWgJPx4JTMRgnuFQUfzznFDYN0W8xZncoAsaSgPa53wA+webn+ peDmWq5iUvZ5VEnljOoHrWrAxccDsTBWmFIs0TETnwfsav8V4LjaYbT/W+gsK0d7JPl6 U0GAlvZ1zPPyctOnG7+c/CC6DpjjIhBKaGGol0l7HVsLyz/5rkHhjC9615A+E6y/w0o+ 6BRSwodU5AU20QCoEDIdAdrxl0aBLfDNicOVrDte04+xiwLZQ3EA2lfg3MNJz+nsLzfQ 8/KMbjPn8jEOQ+bgCrDQCURFhtP4tctWuQ4Yox/uvHAcJ5cZOXjPEEFvhsnYUvOy0SOF TWXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=I2hr1ux1I8k6CzIV+FuN8uImbCIr2dZgJtKmOFSBsgM=; b=DRnuqiUNDPwpVQbTo36x2G9WlkWs/whrgDOpiNLRCP/6UjKJqXRYCBXzWDE4M/jHPU C3S4tbf/v6i5kpl7TQKJ0rgKlhjJycWWC/ZtJhUsiwGFe4SPSnkXHB2gFE+HoELEnmQV eyJhNffZCqraCpJUetpHeI9WfDGwnktEGKwd0XVdT6+ttbJbAawrUOhIhxR/z7ttFDt9 56SXKeqIEwhjnbNq8XHjB49Lk3dPsThHE8vnFGFF/b/bTs2CJ/rCxOLu/v7bzEkOFg76 5Zu3enR5ac9XWifYpIFdpIuQDx9MY/IImACIr0/OHtgKLg/rdATx6PoTUjPAEnYRlY6A yFoA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/GodKccJQCRkBWH2iormm8i9ahOYMpxtiiAgpRdgjNYcCDx4im xDrFPN2EORyiWyMjvjeT/9iA5FRauVg6qKuej7U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vpF/A8IZLmmcxtSXoEadTeunkhr07SLx1hdPuXrqf5BHXXfxDMQFu/eOUUYbnrwebKXphpgLF/yNHnNgMxzTQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:5d4:b0:10c:1f1b:8c81 with SMTP id v20-20020a05687105d400b0010c1f1b8c81mr2220241oan.205.1657068477759; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 17:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMrHYE0X92ONx8tymoHLTwEDQHQ3KmxZh40cV+iqWvQQFj6khg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMrHYE1CnK1JFa4WF5GKJ4=Nc1OHurp6oc2EtzNChpo7sX_UNA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMrHYE1CnK1JFa4WF5GKJ4=Nc1OHurp6oc2EtzNChpo7sX_UNA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jensen Zhang <jingxuan.n.zhang@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 08:47:46 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAbpuyoyB4hRNGCHyjASG7z4UctXk85c-zfD1YHNsN_3bFRHFA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kevin Ma <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Seedorf <jan.seedorf@hft-stuttgart.de>, Jan Seedorf <ietf@j-f-s.de>, "<cdni@ietf.org>" <cdni@ietf.org>, IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fc43dc05e3185144"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/sUJAfAGHYbKPxO1XSfuP7N3dFN4>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:48:03 -0000

Hi Kevin,

Thanks for the information about the new CDNI footprint types.

RFC 9241 is going to be published soon. To leverage Sec 6 of RFC 9241 [1],
the new footprint type should be added to the ALTO Entity Domain Types
registry.

[1]
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9241.html#name-query-footprint-properties-

In the recent ALTO WG weekly meeting, we had some brief discussion on how
to proceed. There are two options:

1. Add a new section/subsection in
draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types to register the new footprint
type "subdivisioncode" to the ALTO Entity Domain Types registry.
2. Submit a new document to ALTO WG later to update the ALTO Entity Domain
Types registry.

Personally, I will suggest the second option. It will keep the current
document clean and not interrupt the IETF process.

I cc'ed ALTO mailing list to see if we have any other feedback from other
ALTO experts.

Best,
Jensen


On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 10:59 PM Kevin Ma <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jensen/Jan,
>
>   With the ALTO CDNI draft to be published shortly, one question came up
> wrt the adding of new footprint types to CDNI: should the ALTO Entity
> Domain Types registry also be updated?  In the case of
> draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types, should subdivisioncode be added
> to the ALTO Entity Domain Types registry?
>
> thanx!
>
> --  Kevin J. MA
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:52 AM Kevin Ma <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>   As we discussed in the session at IETF 113, the footprint extension
>> draft (draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types) is pretty
>> straightforward and registers two useful new footprint types.  There were
>> no objections to moving to WGLC in the session, though Benson Muite did
>> mention a potential concern about ISO3166 codes. This is the official
>> working group last call. If you have any comments, questions, or concerns
>> please respond to this thread.
>>
>> The latest version of the draft can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types/
>>
>> This WGLC will stay open for two weeks and close on May 26, 2022. If no
>> objections or major issues are raised in that time, we will move to submit
>> the draft to the IESG.
>>
>> thanx!
>>
>> -- Kevin and Sanjay
>>
>