Re: [CDNi] Call for Adoption on draft-sopher-cdni-ci-triggers-rfc8007bis

Matthew Stock <stock@csgeeks.org> Mon, 18 October 2021 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <stock@csgeeks.org>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0B73A0768 for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csgeeks-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hjfj2JAnVRyO for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1DD23A096E for <cdni@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id 5so1397831edw.7 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csgeeks-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nv+jf/ODkODF0NzSgYjFZ++E8waKGo/JcThwSd2IOxM=; b=Ys0wvLA6ADt1V/tT1mtkGyYiK868IQozcZfVVRRjOWx2uWOLmMKOWGyLP3V3AonXhg Onf9a7PaZj/a9T6iupCdkruLQxtOoIKUrTnCVzbpLmyGlNdCYkXlpM0BB6RsVw9HrCnZ B8NP+PVJGpRl9xFMMUj/MNnaStawEBE5FYsA7XinLRXl8a/X6hJl2XP5AIJM6dkD+4Q1 TQvazKQQV0JK9FgYboAYpuImsg3rPvXI55WRWk+nriOv/C/R6BTsgo90Aa9GQaJCegc6 lSvWfC4Ez4a0NEjh21pxOPUGVcLKg2xN0/pRCh03YrUkmXk1iHlqH+M0O+w4U14odfA1 uXTw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nv+jf/ODkODF0NzSgYjFZ++E8waKGo/JcThwSd2IOxM=; b=vtuGpl4/uLNNRifgDDh9PtGGpar31c4r+iOi5octCwKzPxiuWMUHuCA//tbxhqbyLy z6JT2BeyCu8aW6a96YPrZlHUP4dPzHOcAugvGjF/kIQGn4oC+PeJxaAWrsLelYtAi8CR 4NYLuawEX0zKv54q//Z2WhiJF6jIQ+Xd08N3sFAzB+dQl2zi76ubpL/e0ntjlalMRBCH ctb4a6wZ+xzjnm7J2WEOzM+0FG812QrBFU3e1CD34e4VzpzJtuoeELa5XULNOpH/FjCU lsKDg+Vko6KqqvzSx9S9HWLs1FL8Z6Vp+jghOOFs8C2Wuwe5m8K3mLvjUN67eEW/Tx0X xYzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530eXfChyLnZ7L/e5U3RjvCnIKQtvHnAk6r9yQTBVsaxltQgCrlY vLrV6AFDE6jSyAirz6VwZYD1cTRAIWRyjLZMsulviiSp
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxc77DQwNlplkjeEZ48BhdZ3R2j5/iOaMWwDH0FTnLelPBfUTjTYaYc4gR1qp7swfxO2OLZj+qPPTP/dhb3heA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:319a:: with SMTP id di26mr47022290edb.84.1634575641797; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMrHYE3tjvBT0xwEq09ssaH0a-zDH0yqr_L8HzXvmizjqLV8pw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+ec=9rXfYcV8jcVkGZiT7DTtNKarN9-05bALUFcuKu4MSpS-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+ec=9rXfYcV8jcVkGZiT7DTtNKarN9-05bALUFcuKu4MSpS-w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Stock <stock@csgeeks.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:47:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJEih4-pqw9gOAAfEKjRrD=Pz6TaK5L1mA-G4PCeHUYgXBiBog@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nir Sopher <nirs@qwilt.com>
Cc: "<cdni@ietf.org>" <cdni@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/zmGytNKSB24LInoxfqp9pP6ESec>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] Call for Adoption on draft-sopher-cdni-ci-triggers-rfc8007bis
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 16:47:38 -0000

I support these changes.

Matt

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 9:51 AM Nir Sopher <nirs@qwilt.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I'm pushing this thread up your mailbox for further feedback regarding the proposed modifications.
>
> Thanks,
> Nir
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021, 06:26 Kevin Ma <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>   As we discussed in the session at IETF 111, the triggers extension draft (draft-ietf-cdni-triggers-extensions-09) that was originally adopted after IETF 103 has been revised to be a full bis draft of the triggers interface.  This was done to make the protocol easier to understand, in a single RFC.  We believe this is a productive change in direction.  The authors have submitted a new document with the same content for easier change tracking.  As this is the same content that was previously adopted, just reformatted, readoption seems reasonable.  This is the official Call for Adoption.  If you have thoughts or opinions, in favor or against, please comment on this thread.
>>
>>   The latest version of the doc is here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sopher-cdni-ci-triggers-rfc8007bis
>>
>>   This CFA will stay open for two weeks and close on September 13, 2021.
>>
>> thanx!
>>
>> --  Kevin and Sanjay
>> _______________________________________________
>> CDNi mailing list
>> CDNi@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
>
> _______________________________________________
> CDNi mailing list
> CDNi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni