IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cellar] Security considerations: recursive elements

Luca Barbato <luca.barbato@libav.org> Sun, 21 January 2018 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <luca.barbato@libav.org>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D17126D73 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:40:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0801ULSBECVy for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:40:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2842D124D37 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 09:40:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eris.local (unknown [85.163.9.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C894C335C51 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 17:40:26 +0000 (UTC)
To: cellar@ietf.org
References: <CAHUoETL6+2XokNy5skB7dzjuzowoL8kV9gNLgd6HeJYiZcXpOQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180117223156.GD3493@michaelspb> <CAOXsMFKcthSiyNFUGvRFhPvBd7fofHHT=J_n33GA=KyfWSitrg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Luca Barbato <luca.barbato@libav.org>
Message-ID: <648259fc-5cd3-99eb-d536-18138308c3d4@libav.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:40:21 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:58.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/58.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOXsMFKcthSiyNFUGvRFhPvBd7fofHHT=J_n33GA=KyfWSitrg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/1CK8msuX7QIZmnOxruKc5G3DgXE>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] Security considerations: recursive elements
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 17:40:44 -0000

On 21/01/2018 18:19, Steve Lhomme wrote:
> All the specs have to say is that the maximum depth indicate the EBML
> depth the file should not go further from. Emphasis on the SHOULD.

+1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email