IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cellar] Working Group Last Call started for draft-ietf-cellar-flac-05

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 07 October 2022 06:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9462CC1522D2 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 23:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AWiwbhaYczOe for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 23:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24986C1522B4 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 23:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [185.201.63.253]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05CA51F459; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 06:16:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 20ED61A0764; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 08:15:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1@gmail.com>, cellar@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <CADQbU68ZcfLwr01XNuWy0dN1Q+j=d4srRumRT7BNB-H9u5be8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <166437509934.62518.2860701282824634413@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKKJt-eWnkciYDBu74VD0-3Zk2xnx1hOvDW3Ry4TMbeaDT-E2A@mail.gmail.com> <CADQbU6_GFWkGUXdTgXzV4VBZ6XAMrR6FFswGeS1uFC_NwY3=jQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-cfU=oGWU0Y4Frx_48GW4NwzxZKUjUOWgtse2Td8CKR4g@mail.gmail.com> <CADQbU68ZcfLwr01XNuWy0dN1Q+j=d4srRumRT7BNB-H9u5be8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1@gmail.com> message dated "Thu, 06 Oct 2022 22:25:51 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 07:15:39 +0100
Message-ID: <201550.1665123339@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/6dJllHwc2YxrPx6PwSpfE8_2GUc>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] Working Group Last Call started for draft-ietf-cellar-flac-05
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 06:16:22 -0000

Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1@gmail.com> wrote:
    > As you might have noticed, quite a few remarks through channels other
    > than the mailing list have been sent to me, as since the start of the
    > last call, there have been 14 PRs added. Does it make sense to upload a
    > new version of the document with most of the PRs merged, before
    > November 1st? For example, by the end of this week? Or would this be
    > considered a bad idea?

Integers are cheap, and smaller diffs are easier to understand.
So, upload as often as you feel is justified, but probably not more often
than weekly.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email