IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cellar] WGLC draft-ietf-cellar-matroska --- status of this document

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 08 April 2022 23:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4FE3A109A for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 16:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k2ggcyL09KIJ for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 16:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24F603A1092 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 16:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [24.51.251.99]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2D091F47A; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 23:50:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id B71871A02F2; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 19:50:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1@gmail.com>, Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <CADQbU69GsEsESX3pzmtk65ShPtAgpUmf=9iScFCdiVcNEQ5Ang@mail.gmail.com>
References: <164858449862.25070.8902627858902423682@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKKJt-fdADMK5ckHykE+4JrhWwzekUBeJf4seNrXsnG_BZGa2A@mail.gmail.com> <12377.1648658517@localhost> <CADQbU69GsEsESX3pzmtk65ShPtAgpUmf=9iScFCdiVcNEQ5Ang@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1@gmail.com> message dated "Thu, 07 Apr 2022 20:27:41 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 19:50:12 -0400
Message-ID: <132215.1649461812@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/BdIuHNIg846SBTu5yeQdWMTeAaQ>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] WGLC draft-ietf-cellar-matroska --- status of this document
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 23:50:23 -0000

Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Under 2, Status of this document, it says
    >> Note that versions 1, 2, and 3 have been finalized. Version 4 is
    >> currently work in progress. There MAY be further additions to v4.

I think version 3, same as flac.

    > This brings up the question, which version of Matroska is defined by
    > the document? I guess all of them, but perhaps this should be stated
    > clearly? Also, it seems strange to base a standards track RFC on a work
    > in progress?

There will be normative references from Matroska to ffv1-v3, RFC9043.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email