IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cellar] Second AD review of draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-10

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Thu, 24 October 2019 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F91612008F for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NukOL6pvI34P for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9881120044 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A483B3897C; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:11:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B74061F; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:14:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
cc: cellar@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <bc6ef067-f360-4630-b6cf-f7b9fcb600f6@www.fastmail.com>
References: <3835cda8-7bfb-4178-bec7-b0acff9327ba@www.fastmail.com> <feca623f-380c-347d-5ab5-63fdc2322d0a@sandelman.ca> <bc6ef067-f360-4630-b6cf-f7b9fcb600f6@www.fastmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:14:26 -0400
Message-ID: <26528.1571940866@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/O1K8WmhE-u8QG2fGHlh9KN_vVlA>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] Second AD review of draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-10
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 18:14:32 -0000

Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> wrote:
    >> A decision as to who is the legitimate documentator of the (existing)
    >> "webm" DocType would be up to the IESG.

    > Is "webm" will be worked on in this WG?

No, not unless Google shows up with it!
WebM shares a container format with Matroska (being EBML), but we are not
trying standard it.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email