IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cellar] math in IETF specifications

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 02 December 2015 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACA31B2C67 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:04:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NN0Zx6WiUyds for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:04:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE9551B2C5F for <cellar@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:04:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id tB2K45Wu053142 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Dec 2015 14:04:06 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110] claimed to be Orochi.local
To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org>, cellar@ietf.org
References: <D99E7E07-C087-4D97-A36B-9F59C8C0FBE4@dericed.com> <565F46D9.90801@nostrum.com> <565F4C10.9040705@xiph.org>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <565F4EB5.4000504@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 14:04:05 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <565F4C10.9040705@xiph.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/OydXb3ny2vNWYx6_0ZydErKdXzQ>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] math in IETF specifications
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 20:04:09 -0000

On 12/2/15 13:52, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote:
> Adam Roach wrote:
>> It seems quite likely that this work will be reaching completion in
>> about the same timeframe as CELLAR is ready to publish its final output.
>
> Given some of our milestone dates, that may be optimistic (or rather, 
> the milestones may be optimistic).

You're right. I had "end of 2016" in my head, but that's the *final* 
milestone rather than the *initial* milestone. The RFC format effort 
will probably come too late, in that case.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email