IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cellar] Request for agenda items - Cellar interim meeting on 12/1

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 29 November 2020 20:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269893A0D95 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 12:20:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MA2Wq2NN3OdK for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 12:20:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B8AF3A0B80 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 12:20:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFF6389B3; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 15:22:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ZeL3B7Zb1WDh; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 15:22:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D75389B1; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 15:22:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E38B70D; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 15:20:24 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: Steve Lhomme <slhomme@matroska.org>, Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-e7AfNBVbekzug2WOi=JSBPZ7jzWrirRWno28QEO9-eqg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKKJt-cNZmAQJwotxBzrj-0ezo70fW_H4Uj1YFAc17-s2=G6bg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOXsMF+wfwLN72Ef+hpNunbA+vSCr+PoEnG4OHaB40L53JMC-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-e7AfNBVbekzug2WOi=JSBPZ7jzWrirRWno28QEO9-eqg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 15:20:24 -0500
Message-ID: <25366.1606681224@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/Wk5VYxehikfpJWenyq1HGvoMgn8>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] Request for agenda items - Cellar interim meeting on 12/1
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:20:28 -0000

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
    > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 1:57 AM Steve Lhomme <slhomme@matroska.org>
    > wrote:

    >> Not much on my side, I mostly concentrated on issue #422 doing various
    >> tests.
    >>
    >> BTW the Tuesday meeting doesn't appear here
    >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/cellar/meetings/


    > I THINK what has happened, is that the secretariat has numbered our
    > interim meetings sequentially, but the meeting titles look like they
    > contain a MONTH, not a sequential number. So I'm seeing
    > interim-2020-cellar-09, but the date is 12-01-2020. Is that what others
    > are seeing?

The meeting numbers are a sequential number, with September having been
cancelled and then rescheduled as virtual.

So it looks like a month number... until it isn't.





--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email