[Cellar] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-cellar-codec-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-cellar-codec-19: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-codec/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work done in this document.

I am balloting a blocking DISCUSS, but it should be trivial to address by
adding a normative reference to `Xiph-style` in section 3.3.25.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Except for one `SHOULD` that follows the IESG statement on BCP14:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-the-use-of-bcp-14-key-words/,
I wonder why the remaining `SHOULD` are not "MUST" ? Please also the IESG
statement by providing guidance about the consequences (even if obvious to the
authors) of not following the `SHOULD`.