IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cellar] [Matroska-Org/ebml-specification] IANA considerations for Element ID allocation (#179)

Jerome Martinez <jerome@mediaarea.net> Wed, 13 June 2018 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jerome@mediaarea.net>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68123130E8A for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 12:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nC4B2ASwQEKD for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 12:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 5.mo69.mail-out.ovh.net (5.mo69.mail-out.ovh.net [46.105.43.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAD78130E87 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 12:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from player687.ha.ovh.net (unknown [10.109.105.1]) by mo69.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B3E18B3B for <cellar@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 21:20:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.2.120] (p3EE2DAB3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [62.226.218.179]) (Authenticated sender: jerome@mediaarea.net) by player687.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BABA2C00A5 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 21:20:51 +0200 (CEST)
To: cellar@ietf.org
References: <Matroska-Org/ebml-specification/pull/179@github.com> <Matroska-Org/ebml-specification/pull/179/review/126618692@github.com> <5086.1528391325@localhost> <541FED05-BFD2-4BF9-A054-0D241107CD0D@dericed.com> <25624.1528903398@localhost>
From: Jerome Martinez <jerome@mediaarea.net>
Message-ID: <9591cfe6-e32b-f22b-d6d0-fc15401285b4@mediaarea.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 21:20:52 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25624.1528903398@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 7967712166131470481
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedthedrledugdefhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/oKEbBhfnoOGYKcAyBZ4o0uBpX_Y>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] [Matroska-Org/ebml-specification] IANA considerations for Element ID allocation (#179)
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:21:03 -0000

On 13/06/2018 17:23, Michael Richardson wrote:
> My goal is to write text that *IANA* will understand, and that represents the
> rough consensus of the group.
> So, again, are there any objections to the essential plan?

It is fine for me, thanks for taking care of it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email