Re: [Cellar] TrackTypes for non-standard data formats

[Matt Gruenke <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Steve Lhomme <[e-mail]> wrote:

> 2017-02-27 3:21 GMT+01:00 Matt Gruenke <[e-mail]>:
>


> > In all of the examples I mentioned, I can foresee cases where these would
> > need to be time-stamped frames that might have a different sampling rate
> > than the video or audio streams, if present.  In fact, this is the case
> for
> > one camera I've used, where the depth sensor operates at a different rate
> > than the primary image sensor.
>
> There is no 'sampling rate' in Matroska. Only the timestamp of a Block
> matters. So audio/video/other don't need to share anything in that
> regard.
>

What I meant by 'sampling rate' wasn't that there would be some exact frame
rate.  I simply meant that there might not be a 1-to-1 relationship between
frames of different types.  Again, to use the example of a certain camera
with a depth sensor, it can capture RGB frames at a different rate than
depth frames.

I mention this simply to point out that the depth frames seem like they
belong in their own track.


Matt