Re: [Cfrg] New draft on the transition from classical to post-quantum cryptography

Richard Outerbridge <outer@interlog.com> Wed, 10 May 2017 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <outer@interlog.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB018129445 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 14:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Do51-lA8Dm6k for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 14:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net (mail-1.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D3391292CE for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 14:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727142EA2B1; Wed, 10 May 2017 17:52:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net ([208.85.220.69]) by localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1dDwxRmys8hD; Wed, 10 May 2017 17:52:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.168.17] (toroon0246w-lp130-02-65-95-160-230.dsl.bell.ca [65.95.160.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: outer@interlog.com) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D64D2EA4A2; Wed, 10 May 2017 17:52:32 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Richard Outerbridge <outer@interlog.com>
In-Reply-To: <76c04fcf-bdc5-54b5-a729-e4be9bf6fe66@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 17:52:31 -0400
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Uri Blumenthal <uri@ll.mit.edu>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, IRTF CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F0628AA9-12CF-4152-AED0-0679F9A669AC@interlog.com>
References: <BAE7613D-D89C-4F19-8FA5-1D3BCC55DCCB@vpnc.org> <78B0B91A8FEB2E43B20BCCE132613181399287CA@mail-essen-01.secunet.de> <9E0DFD44-3000-4E5B-BAE6-2EF74DB3EA4E@vpnc.org> <0d785b8b616846e9aa0eda962d1aade5@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <48F06B9A-7ED4-4711-901C-AA17DD690BC6@vpnc.org> <8076F68B-F7B1-487B-86ED-B6DCFE93EBF2@ll.mit.edu> <E6CCB3B6-3D85-4F98-A8A8-9DA3C97EDF44@vpnc.org> <58C7D7DD-B129-4FF1-B091-9AA8FAA46607@ll.mit.edu> <C28B977F-BF60-4D11-BA55-02BC05B77400@vigilsec.com> <76c04fcf-bdc5-54b5-a729-e4be9bf6fe66@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/4kOtKeMwdNLPsanrmxcQqafDxhI>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] New draft on the transition from classical to post-quantum cryptography
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 21:52:39 -0000

> On 2017-05-10 (130), at 15:35:25, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> On 10/05/17 19:52, Russ Housley wrote:
>> Children born this year might need their healthcare records protected
>> from the discovery of a quantum computer before they die.
> 
> Genomic data from any of us is liable to remain sensitive for our

great-

> grandchildren, in 100 years time. It's sensitivity may even increase
> the longer one waits.


?
__outer