IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CFRG] An update on Web Crypto, and adopting CFRG curves

Daniel Huigens <daniel.huigens@proton.ch> Tue, 16 August 2022 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel.huigens@proton.ch>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B82FC1524AB for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ogXPLeN1LLpg for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-4323.proton.ch (mail-4323.proton.ch [185.70.43.23]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6CB3C1522AD for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 14:53:31 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.ch; s=dod5gnwmcjb3zgjr6u3phik3na.protonmail3; t=1660661620; x=1660920820; bh=pCKDBHvnUgC7ip/3Ye1ey+8dHeMcHICTJBKHSo8gpC8=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To: Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=dhpGnzxPkko/WV1Hwib46b5Wr0nW+GCexxI1+kH39WQoNUWKbqdU2A8NGqh1EK2FO OeRmlHAJqjd550BrMYATMYjtUUcLGx/DHhQT2FauaKqGvFSVanjO1zoYxYq2bVHzZI YeJfsvh//mmvXaMjm0LEaN9nv6P+64o5Mdqs6jKiMpBZGGRUNkOpd6VrFxGT0wErVw whzK+AmW2eYMejwwDeZcqeNfcIt4PAD1e0u6A5p0QQm6LtzMpq3AVor9scd3175u3T eHd3MZZk1Ojh2MFnpspgaBqve6H2BZq8Gnctb8jO1bvp8Y5l/FmFYkdjtj8KCM/fJI 007YmtUIASGuQ==
To: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>
From: Daniel Huigens <daniel.huigens@proton.ch>
Cc: cfrg@irtf.org
Reply-To: Daniel Huigens <daniel.huigens@proton.ch>
Message-ID: <hXgUBB6ynfChz6gq0ym9qiqm26BAkSBI3yDF2HDLd-cE9qfqwHVmrgaKIU6ttjmnIhuyIoy9Qmar-XWY_RY5ioha_V7luiQxxkHxleSZEac=@proton.ch>
In-Reply-To: <1951263b-fafa-483c-af75-eef1eec5be2e@redhat.com>
References: <lOuLx02d-aJwfKgoM3e740D2ipOIu-8AL2TKk_CZ1EGzgw8Q22K6qNOtYmCh9nQ4mHLL5JM5mpwrgF3-2c97PscNJzriGHohgVkjLIT-8XI=@proton.ch> <a53dff15-d554-48a2-80f4-49d8586b10ba@redhat.com> <hL3YIsap8BxoSIeA4ihoOMRLWXLCzpqJlOZfgHcruq3o5p-LfEe7VqC0KYINwLqM3gWj8apsatFyS2RE8VdMzn702r6v_WNRdBmcq0OMTP4=@proton.ch> <1951263b-fafa-483c-af75-eef1eec5be2e@redhat.com>
Feedback-ID: 37000915:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/5x4GFoOllpSfkbzLSd932MeksKw>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] An update on Web Crypto, and adopting CFRG curves
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 14:54:55 -0000

On Tuesday, August 16th, 2022 at 16:11, Hubert Kario wrote:

> I'd say that if we want to ensure consistency, there should be test vectors
> included for all of those corner cases.

Yeah, I agree. The linked PR contains some test vectors for small-order
elements, we could add those to the web-platform-tests [1] as well.
But it's possible that more test cases (and text) is needed to cover
all the cases in the original link you sent (suggestions welcome,
of course - but I'll look into it a bit more as well).

Best,
Daniel

[1]: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email