Re: [Cfrg] proposal for informational RFC

Uri Blumenthal <uri@lucent.com> Thu, 08 August 2002 19:15 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA23800 for <cfrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:15:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id PAA25011 for cfrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:16:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA24984; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:16:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA24955 for <cfrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:16:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from auemail1.firewall.lucent.com (auemail1.lucent.com [192.11.223.161]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA23792 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:15:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nwmail.wh.lucent.com (h135-5-40-100.lucent.com [135.5.40.100]) by auemail1.firewall.lucent.com (Switch-2.2.2/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id g78JFm311390 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:15:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nwmail.wh.lucent.com (8.8.8+Sun/EMS-1.5 sol2) id PAA25940; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:15:47 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: cfrg@ietf.org
Received: from lucent.com by nwmail.wh.lucent.com (8.8.8+Sun/EMS-1.5 sol2) id PAA25914; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:15:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3D52C35B.BB6BD5CC@lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 15:15:39 -0400
From: Uri Blumenthal <uri@lucent.com>
Organization: Lucent Technologies
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD EMS-1.5 (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Catherine A. Meadows" <meadows@itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Original-CC: cfrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] proposal for informational RFC
References: <200208081626.MAA16025@liverwurst.fw5540.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: cfrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: cfrg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: cfrg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> ............. I gave
> an informal talk to the SMuG working group on what a security analyst
> would like to see in an Internet Draft, that is what information
> should be included to make a meaningful security analysis possible......
> I've had some interest from various WGs in seeing the slides from this
> talk... But I've been intending to write this up in a more permament form
> ...It has occurred to me that cfrg might be the most appropriate forum
> for this..................
>
> Would you be interested in seeing something like this? 
> Does cfrg look like an appropriate forum?

In short. Yes and yes.

Thank you!

_______________________________________________
Cfrg mailing list
Cfrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg