IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] Re: Changing the key deriveration

"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Tue, 24 February 2004 18:37 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA03171 for <cfrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:37:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AvhQn-00061D-Gn for cfrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:37:22 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1OIbLk0023121 for cfrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:37:21 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AvhQn-00060q-1O for cfrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:37:21 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA03168 for <cfrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:37:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AvhQi-0003qO-00 for cfrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:37:16 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AvhPo-0003le-00 for cfrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:36:20 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AvhPN-0003gP-00 for cfrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:35:53 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AvhOb-0005nX-4R; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:35:05 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Avfo2-0005XV-8s for cfrg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:53:15 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA29203 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:53:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Avfo1-0001Sb-00 for cfrg@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:53:13 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Avfn8-0001Ny-00 for cfrg@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:52:18 -0500
Received: from thunk.org ([140.239.227.29] helo=thunker.thunk.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Avfmk-0001Il-00 for cfrg@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:51:54 -0500
Received: from dsl092-109-027.nyc2.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.109.27] helo=thunk.org) authenticated as tytso by thunker.thunk.org with asmtp (tls_cipher TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AvflW-0001je-00; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:50:38 -0500
Received: from tytso by thunk.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1AvflU-0007Et-3l; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:50:36 -0500
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:50:35 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Cc: cfrg@ietf.org, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, Charlie Kaufman <ckaufman@microsoft.com>, Hugo Krawczyk <hugo@ee.technion.ac.il>, "The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman" <ho@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Re: Changing the key deriveration
Message-ID: <20040224165035.GA27403@thunk.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.44_heb2.09.0402170435310.18015-100000@ee.technion.ac.il> <p06020427bc5c6de73978@[63.202.92.153]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <p06020427bc5c6de73978@[63.202.92.153]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
Sender: cfrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: cfrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: cfrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HABEAS_SWE autolearn=no version=2.60

On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 06:09:58PM -0800, Paul Hoffman / VPNC wrote:
> At 9:57 PM +0200 2/17/04, Hugo Krawczyk wrote:
> >Anyway, replacing SK_ai and SK_ar in the above text (as well as in 2.15,
> >first paragraph) with SK_d does resolve the problem of using two
> >algorithms (prf and integrity) with the same key, and it is much better
> >than what is done now.
> 
> There have been no more comments on this, and the ADs are still 
> waiting for a final draft of this document so they can move all three 
> IKEv2 documents to IETF last call.

David and Ran --- is the CFRG currently working on some kind of
official statement that represents the consensus of the group, or
should we use the comments made by CFRG members in our deliberations?
If the former, could you give us a timeline when the official comments
from the CFRG can be expected?  If the latter, please accept the
thanks of the IPSEC working group to those members who took the time
to evaluate Hugo's proposal.

						- Ted

_______________________________________________
Cfrg mailing list
Cfrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status