Re: [Cfrg] EC signatures: Quaker poll on preferred scheme, ends on September 24th

James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> Sat, 26 September 2015 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <cloos@jhcloos.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22F31A8725 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.689
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.689 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xDyxR3XsXQSn for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ore.jhcloos.com (ore.jhcloos.com [IPv6:2604:2880::b24d:a297]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A2211A8724 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ore.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id D62581E848; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 22:07:56 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=ore14; t=1443305276; bh=4u6Y6Ekmu70x+d7FDTyQd4xJtdV8BJgOdpfwhLq20mI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=UhOwpCUGjOwiUvVRuuE1w4Ct3/dyri2hh/9kjV87AJtAO+u8ePi4QnGXLQtKpl+1C 6/KN4JmQOoIzIFG2JhRPJYSE9jJtMLPW1HjONwG0LmSa8WSIeS0iZC1cb8C0wQZxu7 OecTkvtPey8niX2tDD0OVuvvxOM3ZNJINkdlXYNk=
Received: by carbon.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id ECAAE106FD889; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 22:05:36 +0000 (UTC)
From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <5606FA44.6060106@cs.tcd.ie> (Stephen Farrell's message of "Sat, 26 Sep 2015 21:04:20 +0100")
References: <55F1BD89.3020902@isode.com> <5606F6FA.7040101@isode.com> <5606FA44.6060106@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQAgMAAABinRfyAAAACVBMVEX///8ZGXBQKKnCrDQ3 AAAAJElEQVQImWNgQAAXzwQg4SKASgAlXIEEiwsSIYBEcLaAtMEAADJnB+kKcKioAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC
Copyright: Copyright 2015 James Cloos
OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6; url=https://jhcloos.com/public_key/0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6.asc
OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:05:36 -0400
Message-ID: <m3zj08g7kf.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
Lines: 13
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Hashcash: 1:28:150926:alexey.melnikov@isode.com::vaZt4LzGMRq6//CV:000000000000000000000000000000000005u+rM
X-Hashcash: 1:28:150926:cfrg@irtf.org::nJC6k+uRyWplHK92:000DIeD4
X-Hashcash: 1:28:150926:stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie::zSIP2vOUmIlPA7Iu:00000000000000000000000000000000000S/zXJ
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/GGvfVGSrS11VS4e4HZbIOFHrvBg>
Cc: cfrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] EC signatures: Quaker poll on preferred scheme, ends on September 24th
X-BeenThere: cfrg@mail.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.mail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.ietf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@mail.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@mail.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@mail.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@mail.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 22:07:59 -0000

>>>>> "SF" == Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> writes:

SF> Since I've not had time to delve into the algorithms I didn't
SF> express an opinion. If it makes a difference though I do think
SF> that eddsa is the option that seems to have both backing from RG
SF> participants and a team of folks willing and able to do the work.
SF> So consider me an unqualified +1 for eddsa as well if you like.

I'm sure a lot of us who didn't vote came to that same conclusion.

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6