IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] Switching the zero-check from MUST to MAY in the curves draft.

Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com> Wed, 18 November 2015 01:06 UTC

Return-Path: <durumcrustulum@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7A51B369D for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:06:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dpLciz-ddG-l for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:06:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x230.google.com (mail-yk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 252D91B36A4 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:06:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ykfs79 with SMTP id s79so38959814ykf.1 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:06:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=iAqCnYUIVvtfrhXR1CefPVI5MtCq7y+kjk0MJesPBWw=; b=jc2wDLZ+JZhYo7bdaAjjvTWogzibtpO0kUR/r/0nxD+S89Ee5KwdqeSs0X7xLSIOC7 BIgJs8j8xGPdjFHKp1KTgO/M86VxatyrdVWH1rW7HlUaV+WavNAV2qNxjNVIlG8xmVj2 G/zWgOy0CvD64Gx4ax/559yJUpDfeXQx8FqbVAP+QAn8ZMIW3NmpsDG9N1porj/x+GHA +EBAF8YFuwWFPLnN1dhsoq5zYG6REKdBPJuo4pFfwpTZ/t7Ij/G4HchTDXzcnb4TCHvQ UES5njhqbSl/7sHsp844V69TL6+ueMFhbWBaHdRENVVY3uaW3kcda56sD0U5JG/6wHn1 16xg==
X-Received: by 10.129.88.7 with SMTP id m7mr43442901ywb.230.1447808782435; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:06:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.128.199 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:05:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAMfhd9U4SBsn9+eKOAYi4ZNJ-RExdXnqx76DuanioqFaFCEH3A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMfhd9XgxrFyRxEqd=4NSX29t=ymQeyq3pT6VjpezUgrm6TyBg@mail.gmail.com> <D26FCB5D.2261F%uri@ll.mit.edu> <CAFR824wRO9mPGmkPhjA9bR5QTkrZ-OVRZsmoiPjBR2-kVrCHDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMfhd9U4SBsn9+eKOAYi4ZNJ-RExdXnqx76DuanioqFaFCEH3A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 20:05:43 -0500
Message-ID: <CAM-2sP3pkg64hKaeLoH3bpLEFM+guBga53=A69XYJiUo_xQQhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114925f42e176e0524c640cd"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/IHkJo3GvpOq7PlxgKqdzEi65a_s>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Switching the zero-check from MUST to MAY in the curves draft.
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 01:06:32 -0000

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
wrote:
>
> I'm not sure that I've strong feelings between SHOULD and MAY in this
> case, but I see your point. I expect I'll see what the feelings of the
> other authors and chairs is during AUTH48 and exactly where to draw
> this line.
>

Sounds good.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email