[Cfrg] Fwd: [IPsec] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 01 April 2013 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E100821E8127 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 16:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w3kAotjZvRoz for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 16:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EABC21E8119 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 16:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-173.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r31NIZA6066722 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 16:18:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 16:18:34 -0700
References: <AFD1096E-BFFD-4F82-9F17-B0FF5F8F227A@vpnc.org>
To: "cfrg@irtf.org CFRG" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Message-Id: <22392F50-A37E-4738-AD2B-2DE109C5DE0B@vpnc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Subject: [Cfrg] Fwd: [IPsec] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 23:18:37 -0000

[[ CFRG: There was a brief presentation on this in Orlando. The IPsecME WG could really use some good cryptography review of this document. Please send all comments to the IPsecME WG mailing list (ipsec@ietf.org). Thanks! ]]

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
> Subject: [IPsec] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks
> Date: April 1, 2013 4:17:18 PM PDT
> To: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
> 
> Greetings. This is the start of the WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks; the WG period will end in two weeks, on April 15. The current draft is available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks-01
> 
> Given that this will be a Standards Track document, it is important for it to be reviewed by as many people as possible. Possible results of individual reviewing the document are:
> 
> - "Looks fine, please publish"
> 
> - "Looks fine, here are some comments"
> 
> - "Has some problems, here they are"
> 
> - Other things of that sort
> 
> Many people on this mailing list are IPsec implementers but are mostly or completely silent on the mailing list. If you are one of those people, doing a WG Last Call review is a good way to participate usefully in the WG. Please strongly consider (a) reading the current draft and (b) sending a message to the list with your short or long review. If there are too few reviews on this document, we could get pushback from the IESG about the document.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>