IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CFRG] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves

"Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com> Thu, 18 March 2021 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <smyshsv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE0D3A2DBF for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lVwDc-0dTbGJ for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com (mail-ej1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F17233A2DBD for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id l4so4571816ejc.10 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pHYVTj0YbIg109bU6T6qMPUgyhZ3JkJX8eX2aX5oO0A=; b=eJu3AwnA6rjWg72TlmI3qyxVqtegoPiLywnZxTn3kVDM3ml5s7tiqq4bfzeH6UGEXG 2Cq49EKltT5UuU86gCuTxDTa0NBjhyipsdaRdKflM2ZaQxfJVHT9RDo0xIu/7WCwLlhf wUuhb01YMpNYUQ1HjPLPKxpN8569c0kMuuiH4vZlbDqLigq/kAeqt91rwXrDJ3uzPafB wFtbNfwS4YlXPaie5Uj2K6wQlf2YLM+fB8/8P4cxTtTCOdeXbum8IhbZhtvYk0lhXd34 aFsaNI3/dH8LvfSnsl9XbYT73akQbq1FIM2hzHRoT2CWRc17eUK68AydhlgP0VU8KvsH 6xSQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pHYVTj0YbIg109bU6T6qMPUgyhZ3JkJX8eX2aX5oO0A=; b=iAdRtSY5N0sl81QMWlwUhIUt8HnyDAQtofrw8dBJOL0LNU2negOmqyx5MLxDb0fHnN BqlOEke33zd3h7BBevWzzXf1Ksxr4Q/D+9S4gdA/Ld1UKVPRbI9tQRrkUj2JerFgyVBv XhmJrebCPxdwmcijXR5NuHGzgCcCCKEKiDw1KOk0z0wHN74PLIRiVfR7/M9te96hzQZ1 rtXgBY8/sakaTvXaAtfEjeq877Ui9ZvvEo0kYhhU8YfXrh6kUzR7Si/tOQ+QIHY0rzib p8jpgj+VZEpUo1aZN4Pb0Z6i618C8fPXF9CKx1yrmiLhYsbrGWgHegUPE9mfHmevFlIU 9gPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531cFjmFZtiGf1p9nYY0KrTg1WjpydiINqRtmBP15tukdcK/cxpb FfUP6BgLCIBohZwZ1/0hZP0JYNAZFLWCQCyAV0A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8vulAXlS2KR6lNIp9Te150tIeYBhupjfI+PORbVn9t5Y2KpDmY7nXJa04M325Zmp5k7GsSpwbDrw1bHzrj2Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3b99:: with SMTP id u25mr41344367ejf.277.1616081028469; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMr0u6kY_KrKp5b1j3ftVmRBQCEptCqEievYHJvFXFEouvCSzA@mail.gmail.com> <2a2ea245-79e3-dcea-3176-7b5c5742b941@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2a2ea245-79e3-dcea-3176-7b5c5742b941@gmail.com>
From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:23:36 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMr0u6kFDpiFM-fiPqjzGVQh8LT+pL-8aUJxeWR7Nyj3nQcnpg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>
Cc: CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>, Tetsutaro Kobayashi <tetsutaro.kobayashi.dr@hco.ntt.co.jp>, cfrg-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a1563305bdd12f93"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/O2cIsSpR7GbeieUrWuUgR6jrE1s>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:23:53 -0000

Dear Rene,

Yumi replied to the received comments in the following message in December:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/2i183zl28y4fK54oIwqEfEVVu0U/ (after
the line "Followings are our reply comments for Rene's comments in RGLC.").
After that message there were two messages in the mailing list with support
of the draft, no new concerns.

After that message there was also one clarifying message from Yumi in
February about the normative references (I asked to send that message since
I had found out that that comment remained unanswered).

Regards,
Stanislav


On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 15:52, Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Stanislav:
>
> I am puzzled that the 2nd WGLC is on rev09 of the pairing curve draft
> (i.e., the one posted on Nov 16th last year).
>
> On Nov 11th, I posted another review on rev08 of this document (see [1])
> {for my review of the previous rev07 version, see [2]}.
>
> I could not find any response by the authors to my detailed comments of my
> rev08 review. Since they posted the current rev09 version (that is under
> 2nd WGLC) on Nov 16th, considerations of those comments must have happened
> within that 5-day time window. The authors, however, stated in [3]
> "Because we are currently considering Rene's latest comments, I'm sorry but
> this version does not reflect them".
>
> Isn't the normal step to consider received comments? If so, isn't the 2nd
> WGLC premature?
>
> (FYI - the authors only commented - after almost four months - on my minor
> note regarding normative vs. informative reference classification, but not
> at all on the much larger review I did in [1].)
>
> Best regards, Rene
>
> [1] Review RS of draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves-08 (Nov 11, 2020):
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/kAQwgiKejMby4aYONkQzt0ZiOOU/
>
> [2] Review RS of draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves-07 (July 12,
> 2020):
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/pW71h3yUETnqedHsH0m3rwzPnm4/
>
> [2] Message Yumi Sakemi on draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves-09 (Nov
> 16, 2020):
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/NNpHIWGOvsSBd22gg7Ve10zDhT4/
>
>
> On 2021-03-18 7:04 a.m., Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev wrote:
>
> Dear CFRG participants,
>
> This message starts a second 3-week RGLC on "Pairing-Friendly Curves"
> (draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves-09), that will end on April 9th.
> See
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves/
> for the latest version of the draft.
>
> We are having the second RGLC since Yumi Sakemi has provided (see
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/2-LVS6EXc4TfY1zlHRGUXe3cu6w/)
> replies for the questions raised after the first RGLC.
>
> Please send your comments, as well as expression of support to publish as
> an RFC (or possible reasons for not doing so) in reply to this message or
> directly to CFRG chairs.
>
> Regards,
> Stanislav, Nick and Alexey
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CFRG mailing listCFRG@irtf.orghttps://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>
>
> --
> email: rstruik.ext@gmail.com | Skype: rstruik
> cell: +1 (647) 867-5658 | US: +1 (415) 287-3867
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email